Examining the empirical evidence of transport inequality in the US and UK

K. Clifton, K. Lucas
{"title":"Examining the empirical evidence of transport inequality in the US and UK","authors":"K. Clifton, K. Lucas","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781861345707.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter describes how it is important to first gain a better understanding of the inequalities that arise from the present system of transport delivery in order to argue the case of taking a social policy approach to transport. The chapter presents the statistical and qualitative evidence for this in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US). However, it should be noted that distributional inequities in and of themselves do not necessarily justify the need for social policy intervention. It is generally accepted that such intervention is only appropriate where the welfare of citizens is already, or may become, underminded. With this in mind, the later sections of the chapter examine the evidence for this with particular emphasis on the effects of transport inequalities on people’s ability to access the key activities, which are considered essential to the welfare of citizens, namely employment, education and training, healthcare and social, leisure and cultural activities.","PeriodicalId":218663,"journal":{"name":"Running on Empty","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"73","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Running on Empty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781861345707.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 73

Abstract

This chapter describes how it is important to first gain a better understanding of the inequalities that arise from the present system of transport delivery in order to argue the case of taking a social policy approach to transport. The chapter presents the statistical and qualitative evidence for this in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US). However, it should be noted that distributional inequities in and of themselves do not necessarily justify the need for social policy intervention. It is generally accepted that such intervention is only appropriate where the welfare of citizens is already, or may become, underminded. With this in mind, the later sections of the chapter examine the evidence for this with particular emphasis on the effects of transport inequalities on people’s ability to access the key activities, which are considered essential to the welfare of citizens, namely employment, education and training, healthcare and social, leisure and cultural activities.
考察美国和英国交通不平等的经验证据
本章描述了为什么首先要更好地理解目前运输交付系统所产生的不平等,以便论证采取社会政策方法解决运输问题。本章提出了统计和定性的证据,这在英国(英国)和美国(美国)。但是,应当指出,分配不平等本身并不一定证明有必要进行社会政策干预。人们普遍认为,只有在公民的福利已经或可能受到损害的情况下,这种干预才是合适的。考虑到这一点,本章后面几节审查了这方面的证据,特别强调交通不平等对人们参加关键活动的能力的影响,这些活动被认为对公民的福利至关重要,即就业、教育和培训、医疗保健以及社会、休闲和文化活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信