Teaching Critical Thinking about Media Technologies

James W. Hamilton
{"title":"Teaching Critical Thinking about Media Technologies","authors":"James W. Hamilton","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2014.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the past few years, I have taught critical thinking about media technologies to first-year undergraduates—people notoriously dependent (perhaps stereotypically so) on their smartphones, MP3 players, and social media accounts. Although the course does not fit neatly into traditional academic departments, an initiative at the University of Georgia to boost the quality of the first-year student experience by creating small one-credit seminars gave me the room to teach it. My university is a large selective school. Students choose the required one-credit seminar based on interest, and come to the course with a wide range of degree plans and interests. My course about media technologies takes a theoretical and historical view. Meetings in the first few weeks take up the theoretical component. In it, students explore common definitions and ways of thinking about media technologies. For the remainder of the semester, students conduct historical research using primary sources (largely newspapers and magazines) to investigate periods when media technologies were being introduced, initially publicized, and talked about. Searchable databases of digital facsimiles of historical newspapers and magazines facilitate this research. I learned the hard way the first time I taught the class how difficult it is for students to see the relevance of earlier times to their own, so I now address students’ habitual views of media technology much more explicitly in the first few weeks. Doing so disinters deeply buried truisms so that students recognize and consider them. The goal of the class ultimately is not to enforce a view but to enable students to make critical thinking a common part not only of this class, but also in all realms of their lives.","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2014.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the past few years, I have taught critical thinking about media technologies to first-year undergraduates—people notoriously dependent (perhaps stereotypically so) on their smartphones, MP3 players, and social media accounts. Although the course does not fit neatly into traditional academic departments, an initiative at the University of Georgia to boost the quality of the first-year student experience by creating small one-credit seminars gave me the room to teach it. My university is a large selective school. Students choose the required one-credit seminar based on interest, and come to the course with a wide range of degree plans and interests. My course about media technologies takes a theoretical and historical view. Meetings in the first few weeks take up the theoretical component. In it, students explore common definitions and ways of thinking about media technologies. For the remainder of the semester, students conduct historical research using primary sources (largely newspapers and magazines) to investigate periods when media technologies were being introduced, initially publicized, and talked about. Searchable databases of digital facsimiles of historical newspapers and magazines facilitate this research. I learned the hard way the first time I taught the class how difficult it is for students to see the relevance of earlier times to their own, so I now address students’ habitual views of media technology much more explicitly in the first few weeks. Doing so disinters deeply buried truisms so that students recognize and consider them. The goal of the class ultimately is not to enforce a view but to enable students to make critical thinking a common part not only of this class, but also in all realms of their lives.
媒体技术批判性思维教学
在过去的几年里,我教过一年级本科生关于媒体技术的批判性思维——众所周知,他们依赖于智能手机、MP3播放器和社交媒体账户(也许是刻板印象)。虽然这门课程并不完全符合传统的学术院系,但佐治亚大学(University of Georgia)发起了一项倡议,通过举办单学分的小型研讨会来提高一年级学生体验的质量,这给了我讲授这门课程的空间。我的大学是一所规模很大的名校。学生根据兴趣选择所需的一学分研讨会,并带着广泛的学位计划和兴趣来参加课程。我的媒体技术课程从理论和历史的角度出发。最初几周的会议主要讨论理论部分。在课程中,学生探索媒体技术的常见定义和思考方式。在本学期剩下的时间里,学生将使用原始资料(主要是报纸和杂志)进行历史研究,以调查媒体技术被引入、最初宣传和讨论的时期。历史报纸和杂志的数字复制品的可检索数据库有助于这项研究。在我第一次教这门课的时候,我经历了惨痛的教训,让学生们看到以前的时代与他们自己的时代的相关性是多么困难,所以我现在在头几周更明确地阐述了学生们对媒体技术的习惯性看法。这样做可以发现深埋的真理,让学生认识并思考它们。这门课的最终目标不是强迫学生接受一种观点,而是让学生不仅在这门课上,而且在他们生活的各个领域都能进行批判性思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信