Amit Dhurandhar, B. Graves, Rajesh Kumar Ravi, Gopikrishnan Maniachari, M. Ettl
{"title":"Big Data System for Analyzing Risky Procurement Entities","authors":"Amit Dhurandhar, B. Graves, Rajesh Kumar Ravi, Gopikrishnan Maniachari, M. Ettl","doi":"10.1145/2783258.2788563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An accredited biennial 2014 study by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners claims that on average 5% of a company's revenue is lost because of unchecked fraud every year. The reason for such heavy losses are that it takes around 18 months for a fraud to be caught and audits catch only 3% of the actual fraud. This begs the need for better tools and processes to be able to quickly and cheaply identify potential malefactors. In this paper, we describe a robust tool to identify procurement related fraud/risk, though the general design and the analytical components could be adapted to detecting fraud in other domains. Besides analyzing standard transactional data, our solution analyzes multiple public and private data sources leading to wider coverage of fraud types than what generally exists in the marketplace. Moreover, our approach is more principled in the sense that the learning component, which is based on investigation feedback has formal guarantees. Though such a tool is ever evolving, a deployment of this tool over the past 12 months has found many interesting cases from compliance risk and fraud point of view across more than 150 countries and 65000+ vendors, increasing the number of true positives found by over 80\\% compared with other state-of-the-art tools that the domain experts were previously using.","PeriodicalId":243428,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2783258.2788563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
An accredited biennial 2014 study by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners claims that on average 5% of a company's revenue is lost because of unchecked fraud every year. The reason for such heavy losses are that it takes around 18 months for a fraud to be caught and audits catch only 3% of the actual fraud. This begs the need for better tools and processes to be able to quickly and cheaply identify potential malefactors. In this paper, we describe a robust tool to identify procurement related fraud/risk, though the general design and the analytical components could be adapted to detecting fraud in other domains. Besides analyzing standard transactional data, our solution analyzes multiple public and private data sources leading to wider coverage of fraud types than what generally exists in the marketplace. Moreover, our approach is more principled in the sense that the learning component, which is based on investigation feedback has formal guarantees. Though such a tool is ever evolving, a deployment of this tool over the past 12 months has found many interesting cases from compliance risk and fraud point of view across more than 150 countries and 65000+ vendors, increasing the number of true positives found by over 80\% compared with other state-of-the-art tools that the domain experts were previously using.
2014年,美国注册欺诈审查员协会(Association of Certified Fraud Examiners)进行了一项两年一次的认证研究,该研究称,由于未经检查的欺诈行为,公司平均每年损失5%的收入。造成如此巨大损失的原因是,发现欺诈行为需要大约18个月的时间,而审计只发现了实际欺诈行为的3%。这就需要更好的工具和流程,以便能够快速、廉价地识别潜在的不良因素。在本文中,我们描述了一个强大的工具来识别采购相关的欺诈/风险,尽管一般设计和分析组件可以适应于检测其他领域的欺诈。除了分析标准的交易数据外,我们的解决方案还分析多个公共和私有数据源,从而比市场上通常存在的欺诈类型覆盖更广的范围。此外,我们的方法在基于调查反馈的学习组件具有正式保证的意义上更具原则性。虽然这样的工具一直在发展,但在过去的12个月里,从合规风险和欺诈的角度来看,该工具的部署已经在150多个国家和65000多家供应商中发现了许多有趣的案例,与领域专家以前使用的其他最先进的工具相比,发现的真实阳性数量增加了80%以上。