Predictors of In-hospital Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With COPD Exacerbation

Nooshin Hemmati, Gholamreza Mortazavi Moghaddam, F. Salmani, M. Zardast
{"title":"Predictors of In-hospital Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With COPD Exacerbation","authors":"Nooshin Hemmati, Gholamreza Mortazavi Moghaddam, F. Salmani, M. Zardast","doi":"10.5812/zjrms-122936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with significant mortality. Objectives: The present study aimed to identify the risk factors that contribute to hospital outcomes of patients admitted with COPD exacerbation. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 74 patients hospitalized with COPD exacerbation. Pulse oximetry, complete blood count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and venous blood gas were taken under standard conditions. The clinical condition of patients was scored based on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and shortness of breath based on the standard, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) questionnaire. The patients were divided into three groups based on in-hospital outcomes (i.e., favorable, unfavorable, and terrible or worse). One-way analysis of variance, chi-square test, logistic regression model, and odds ratio (OR) analysis were used to determine the most important factors associated with outcomes. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 74 patients, 43 (58.1%) and 31 (41.9%) subjects were male and female, respectively. The patients’ mean age was 68.19 ± 10.62 years. The number (%) of patients in favorable, unfavorable, and worse outcome groups was 27 (36.48%), 30 (40.54%), and 17 (22.97%), respectively. As the CAT and mMRC score increased, the chance of terrible outcomes also increased (OR = 1.22, confidence interval (CI): 1.10 - 1.35). There was no significant correlation between worse outcomes and hs-CRP. The PCT was significantly higher in the group with worse outcomes than in the groups with favorable and unfavorable outcomes (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The COPD evaluation by the CAT and mMRC plays an important role in the in-hospital outcomes of hospitalized COPD patients with exacerbation. The serum level of PCT was also a determinant factor of prognosis in hospitalized patients with COPD exacerbation.","PeriodicalId":292747,"journal":{"name":"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/zjrms-122936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with significant mortality. Objectives: The present study aimed to identify the risk factors that contribute to hospital outcomes of patients admitted with COPD exacerbation. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 74 patients hospitalized with COPD exacerbation. Pulse oximetry, complete blood count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and venous blood gas were taken under standard conditions. The clinical condition of patients was scored based on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and shortness of breath based on the standard, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) questionnaire. The patients were divided into three groups based on in-hospital outcomes (i.e., favorable, unfavorable, and terrible or worse). One-way analysis of variance, chi-square test, logistic regression model, and odds ratio (OR) analysis were used to determine the most important factors associated with outcomes. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 74 patients, 43 (58.1%) and 31 (41.9%) subjects were male and female, respectively. The patients’ mean age was 68.19 ± 10.62 years. The number (%) of patients in favorable, unfavorable, and worse outcome groups was 27 (36.48%), 30 (40.54%), and 17 (22.97%), respectively. As the CAT and mMRC score increased, the chance of terrible outcomes also increased (OR = 1.22, confidence interval (CI): 1.10 - 1.35). There was no significant correlation between worse outcomes and hs-CRP. The PCT was significantly higher in the group with worse outcomes than in the groups with favorable and unfavorable outcomes (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The COPD evaluation by the CAT and mMRC plays an important role in the in-hospital outcomes of hospitalized COPD patients with exacerbation. The serum level of PCT was also a determinant factor of prognosis in hospitalized patients with COPD exacerbation.
COPD急性加重住院患者住院结局的预测因素
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的急性加重与显著的死亡率相关。目的:本研究旨在确定影响COPD加重患者住院预后的危险因素。方法:对74例COPD急性加重住院患者进行前瞻性横断面研究。在标准条件下进行脉搏血氧测定、全血细胞计数、高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)、静脉血气测定。根据COPD评估测试(CAT)对患者的临床状况进行评分,并根据标准的修订医学研究委员会(mMRC)问卷对患者的呼吸短促进行评分。根据住院结果(即,有利、不利、糟糕或更糟)将患者分为三组。采用单因素方差分析、卡方检验、logistic回归模型和比值比(OR)分析确定与结果相关的最重要因素。p值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:74例患者中,男性43例(58.1%),女性31例(41.9%)。患者平均年龄68.19±10.62岁。结果良好、不良和较差组分别为27例(36.48%)、30例(40.54%)和17例(22.97%)。随着CAT和mMRC评分的增加,不良结局发生的几率也增加(OR = 1.22,置信区间(CI): 1.10 - 1.35)。不良预后与hs-CRP无显著相关性。预后不良组PCT明显高于预后良好组和预后不良组(P < 0.01)。结论:CAT和mMRC对COPD住院加重患者的院内结局有重要影响。血清PCT水平也是COPD急性加重住院患者预后的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信