Was the recent economic downturn a recession

Jeremy Piger
{"title":"Was the recent economic downturn a recession","authors":"Jeremy Piger","doi":"10.20955/es.2002.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"L ate last year, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) announced that the U.S. economy entered a recession in March 2001. Some have questioned whether the recent downturn really qualifies as a recession, as by some measures it has been quite mild. For example, the broadest measure of the economy’s output, real gross domestic prod uct (GDP), experienced only a modest decline in the current recession. However, given that more timely measures of economic activity are available, the NBER gives relatively little weight to GDP in determining recession dates. Instead, the NBER defines a recession as a “significant decline in activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, visible in industrial production, employ ment, real income, and wholesale-retail sales.”1 To investigate whether the recent economic downturn meets this definition, I use past recessions as a yardstick. The table details the significance and length of decline in the four variables included in the NBER recession definition for each recession over the past 40 years. Signi fi cance is measured by the percentage decline in each variable from its individual peak to its individual trough. This is computed by finding the lowest point each variable reached during or a year following the recession (called the trough) and subtracting this value from the highest point the variable reached in the past (called the peak). Beside this statistic, in parentheses, is the time in months between individual peak and trough for each series, a mea sure of the length of the decline. The statistics for the current recession assume the troughs have been reached for all of these variables. The table shows that both employment and industrial production have experienced significant and lengthy declines in the current recession; the magnitudes of the declines are similar to those observed in several past recessions and lasted for 13 and 18 months, respectively, longer than the average of the previous recessions. The employment decline is of particular interest, as the NBER gives extra emphasis to employment movements in determining recession dates. The decline in sales during the current recession has been notably mild relative to previous recessions, dropping less than half as much as in the 1990-91 recession. Nevertheless, such a protracted sales decline has never occurred within any expansion. In the sample period considered here, there have been only three months not related to an NBER recession in which sales had declined 2.4 percent below their prior peak, the level reached in the current recession. In all three cases these episodes lasted just one month, with sales bouncing back above their peak in the following month. By contrast, sales in the current recession remained below their peak for 10 consecutive months before the trough was reached, suggesting the recent sales data have more in common with past recessions than past expansions. Finally, as in the 1960-61 and 1969-70 recessions, personal income experienced no sustained fall during the current recession. Was the recent economic downturn a recession? This evidence suggests that, when compared with past recessions, this downturn does measure up. NBER’s business-cycle dating procedure, June 7, 2002. nber.org/cycles/recessions.html. Was the Recent Economic Downturn a Recession?","PeriodicalId":305484,"journal":{"name":"National Economic Trends","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Economic Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20955/es.2002.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

L ate last year, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) announced that the U.S. economy entered a recession in March 2001. Some have questioned whether the recent downturn really qualifies as a recession, as by some measures it has been quite mild. For example, the broadest measure of the economy’s output, real gross domestic prod uct (GDP), experienced only a modest decline in the current recession. However, given that more timely measures of economic activity are available, the NBER gives relatively little weight to GDP in determining recession dates. Instead, the NBER defines a recession as a “significant decline in activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, visible in industrial production, employ ment, real income, and wholesale-retail sales.”1 To investigate whether the recent economic downturn meets this definition, I use past recessions as a yardstick. The table details the significance and length of decline in the four variables included in the NBER recession definition for each recession over the past 40 years. Signi fi cance is measured by the percentage decline in each variable from its individual peak to its individual trough. This is computed by finding the lowest point each variable reached during or a year following the recession (called the trough) and subtracting this value from the highest point the variable reached in the past (called the peak). Beside this statistic, in parentheses, is the time in months between individual peak and trough for each series, a mea sure of the length of the decline. The statistics for the current recession assume the troughs have been reached for all of these variables. The table shows that both employment and industrial production have experienced significant and lengthy declines in the current recession; the magnitudes of the declines are similar to those observed in several past recessions and lasted for 13 and 18 months, respectively, longer than the average of the previous recessions. The employment decline is of particular interest, as the NBER gives extra emphasis to employment movements in determining recession dates. The decline in sales during the current recession has been notably mild relative to previous recessions, dropping less than half as much as in the 1990-91 recession. Nevertheless, such a protracted sales decline has never occurred within any expansion. In the sample period considered here, there have been only three months not related to an NBER recession in which sales had declined 2.4 percent below their prior peak, the level reached in the current recession. In all three cases these episodes lasted just one month, with sales bouncing back above their peak in the following month. By contrast, sales in the current recession remained below their peak for 10 consecutive months before the trough was reached, suggesting the recent sales data have more in common with past recessions than past expansions. Finally, as in the 1960-61 and 1969-70 recessions, personal income experienced no sustained fall during the current recession. Was the recent economic downturn a recession? This evidence suggests that, when compared with past recessions, this downturn does measure up. NBER’s business-cycle dating procedure, June 7, 2002. nber.org/cycles/recessions.html. Was the Recent Economic Downturn a Recession?
最近的经济衰退是经济衰退吗
去年年底,美国国家经济研究局(NBER)发表说,美国经济已于2001年3月进入衰退。一些人质疑最近的经济衰退是否真的符合经济衰退的标准,因为从某些方面来看,经济衰退相当温和。例如,衡量经济产出的最广泛指标——实际国内生产总值(GDP),在当前的衰退中只出现了轻微的下降。然而,鉴于有更及时的经济活动衡量指标,NBER在确定衰退日期时对GDP的权重相对较小。相反,NBER将经济衰退定义为“整个经济活动的显著下降,持续几个月以上,可见于工业生产、就业、实际收入和批发零售销售。”为了调查最近的经济衰退是否符合这一定义,我用过去的衰退作为衡量标准。该表详细说明了在过去40年中,NBER衰退定义中包含的四个变量的衰退的重要性和持续时间。显著性是通过每个变量从其个别峰值到个别低谷的百分比下降来衡量的。这是通过找出每个变量在衰退期间或之后一年内达到的最低点(称为低谷),并从该变量过去达到的最高点(称为峰值)中减去该值来计算的。在这个统计数据旁边,括号内是每个系列的个别峰值和低谷之间的月间隔时间,这意味着下降的长度。当前经济衰退的统计数据假设所有这些变量都已触底。该表显示,在当前的经济衰退中,就业和工业生产都经历了显著而漫长的下降;这次衰退的幅度与过去几次衰退中观察到的相似,分别持续了13个月和18个月,比之前几次衰退的平均时间要长。就业下降尤其令人感兴趣,因为NBER在确定衰退日期时特别强调了就业变动。与之前的经济衰退相比,当前经济衰退期间的销售下滑明显温和,降幅不到1990-91年衰退时的一半。然而,如此长期的销售下滑从未在任何扩张中发生过。在这里考虑的样本期内,只有三个月与NBER衰退无关,其中销售额比之前的峰值(当前衰退中达到的水平)下降了2.4%。在这三种情况下,这种情况只持续了一个月,销量在接下来的一个月反弹至峰值以上。相比之下,在本轮衰退中,销售在触底前连续10个月低于峰值水平,这表明近期销售数据与以往的衰退有更多共同点,而非以往的扩张。最后,与1960年至1961年和1969年至1970年的衰退一样,本次衰退期间个人收入没有出现持续下降。最近的经济衰退是经济衰退吗?这一证据表明,与以往的衰退相比,这次的衰退确实符合标准。2002年6月7日,国家经济研究局的商业周期测定程序。nber.org/cycles/recessions.html。最近的经济低迷是经济衰退吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信