Is developing a clinical decision support system based on the Robson's classification sufficient to reduce cesarean rates?

Juliano de Souza Gaspar, Juliana Silva Barra, Z. Reis
{"title":"Is developing a clinical decision support system based on the Robson's classification sufficient to reduce cesarean rates?","authors":"Juliano de Souza Gaspar, Juliana Silva Barra, Z. Reis","doi":"10.23919/CISTI.2018.8399413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to analyze the trend of cesarean section rates in a public hospital maternity after the implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System (SADC) for the Robson Classification. The implementation developed a model based on a decision tree that proposes the classification of pregnant women into ten groups based on six basic variables. After implantation, the cesarean section rates was observed between 2016 and 2017. In this period, there were 4,155 deliveries (37.6% cesarean sections). The evolution of cesarean section rates followed a growth trend, as well as the proportion of cesareans section between groups classified as 1 to 4, groups of pregnant women where cesarean sections are very preventable. In the two years it was observed that the SADC had no impact on the reduction of cesarean rates. It was concluded that in health services, work processes need to be articulated with timely decision-making strategies, so that the execution of actions can promote the qualification of services and improve the quality of patient care.","PeriodicalId":347825,"journal":{"name":"2018 13th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 13th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2018.8399413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the trend of cesarean section rates in a public hospital maternity after the implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System (SADC) for the Robson Classification. The implementation developed a model based on a decision tree that proposes the classification of pregnant women into ten groups based on six basic variables. After implantation, the cesarean section rates was observed between 2016 and 2017. In this period, there were 4,155 deliveries (37.6% cesarean sections). The evolution of cesarean section rates followed a growth trend, as well as the proportion of cesareans section between groups classified as 1 to 4, groups of pregnant women where cesarean sections are very preventable. In the two years it was observed that the SADC had no impact on the reduction of cesarean rates. It was concluded that in health services, work processes need to be articulated with timely decision-making strategies, so that the execution of actions can promote the qualification of services and improve the quality of patient care.
开发基于罗布森分级的临床决策支持系统是否足以降低剖宫产率?
本研究的目的是分析公立医院产科剖宫产率的趋势后,临床决策支持系统(SADC)的罗布森分类实施。实施方案开发了一个基于决策树的模型,该模型根据六个基本变量将孕妇分为十组。观察着床后2016 ~ 2017年的剖宫产率。在此期间,共有4155例分娩(37.6%为剖宫产)。剖宫产率的演变呈增长趋势,剖宫产在1 ~ 4组孕妇中所占比例也呈增长趋势,其中剖宫产是可预防的。在这两年中,观察到南部非洲发展共同体对降低剖宫产率没有任何影响。结论是,在保健服务方面,工作流程需要与及时的决策战略相结合,以便行动的执行能够提高服务的质量并改善病人护理的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信