LECTURE: Legal Alchemy: The Use and Misuse of Science in the Law

David L. Faigman
{"title":"LECTURE: Legal Alchemy: The Use and Misuse of Science in the Law","authors":"David L. Faigman","doi":"10.5860/choice.37-3873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is scientific information misused by this country's court system and lawmakers? Today more than ever before, lawyers, politicians, and government administrators are forced to wrestle with scientific research and to employ scientific thinking. The results are often less than enlightened. In \"Legal Alchemy,\" David Faigman explores the ways the American legal system incorporates scientific knowledge into its decision making. Praised by both legal and scientific communities when it first appeared in hardcover, \"Legal Alchemy\" shows how science has been used and misused in a variety of settings, including - The Courtroom--from the O. J. Simpson trial to the Dow Corning silicone breast implant lawsuit to landmark cases such as Roe v. Wade. - The Legislature--where Congress uses scientific information to help enact legislation about clean air, cloning, and government science projects like the space station and the superconducting super collider. - Government Agencies--who use science to determine policy on a variety of topics, from regulating sport utility vehicles to reintroducing gray wolves to Yellowstone National Park. As Faigman describes these and other important cases, he provides disturbing evidence that many judges, juries, and members of Congress simply don't understand the science behind their decisions. Finally, he offers suggestions on how the science and legal professions can overcome their miscommunication and work together more effectively.","PeriodicalId":385021,"journal":{"name":"Yale Journal of Law and Technology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-3873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Is scientific information misused by this country's court system and lawmakers? Today more than ever before, lawyers, politicians, and government administrators are forced to wrestle with scientific research and to employ scientific thinking. The results are often less than enlightened. In "Legal Alchemy," David Faigman explores the ways the American legal system incorporates scientific knowledge into its decision making. Praised by both legal and scientific communities when it first appeared in hardcover, "Legal Alchemy" shows how science has been used and misused in a variety of settings, including - The Courtroom--from the O. J. Simpson trial to the Dow Corning silicone breast implant lawsuit to landmark cases such as Roe v. Wade. - The Legislature--where Congress uses scientific information to help enact legislation about clean air, cloning, and government science projects like the space station and the superconducting super collider. - Government Agencies--who use science to determine policy on a variety of topics, from regulating sport utility vehicles to reintroducing gray wolves to Yellowstone National Park. As Faigman describes these and other important cases, he provides disturbing evidence that many judges, juries, and members of Congress simply don't understand the science behind their decisions. Finally, he offers suggestions on how the science and legal professions can overcome their miscommunication and work together more effectively.
讲座:法律炼金术:科学在法律中的运用与误用
这个国家的法院系统和立法者滥用科学信息了吗?今天,律师、政治家和政府管理人员比以往任何时候都更被迫与科学研究作斗争,并运用科学思维。结果往往不那么开明。在《法律炼金术》(Legal Alchemy)一书中,大卫·费格曼(David Faigman)探讨了美国法律体系如何将科学知识融入其决策过程。当《法律炼金术》首次以精装版出现时,受到了法律界和科学界的赞扬,它展示了科学是如何在各种环境中被使用和滥用的,包括法庭——从o.j.辛普森审判到道康宁硅胶乳房植入物诉讼,再到罗伊诉韦德等具有里程碑意义的案件。-立法机构——国会利用科学信息帮助制定有关清洁空气、克隆和政府科学项目(如空间站和超导超级对撞机)的立法。-政府机构——他们利用科学来确定各种主题的政策,从监管运动型多用途车到将灰狼重新引入黄石国家公园。在费格曼描述这些和其他重要案例时,他提供了令人不安的证据,表明许多法官、陪审团和国会议员根本不了解他们做出决定背后的科学依据。最后,他就科学和法律专业如何克服误解、更有效地合作提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信