Predictors of success performing ureterolitotripsy.

S. Darenkov, E. Pronkin, G.A. Monastyrnyy, V. A. Novikov
{"title":"Predictors of success performing ureterolitotripsy.","authors":"S. Darenkov, E. Pronkin, G.A. Monastyrnyy, V. A. Novikov","doi":"10.29188/2222-8543-2023-16-1-68-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urolithiasis is one of the most common diseases seen by urologists. In 28% of patients with kidney stones, the disease is symptomatic. The benefits of ureteral stone extraction include minimal invasiveness, a shorter postoperative recovery time, and a favourable safety profile. Aim: to compare and evaluate the relationship between the density of the ureter, the density of the calculus, its localization and the value of the creatinine level and predicting the success of ureterolithoextraction. Materials and methods. In total, 125 ureteral lithotripsy procedures were performed (42 in women and 83 in men). Initially, the patients were divided into two groups. In the first group, ureteral stone extraction was performed in 97 patients. The second group included 28 patients with ureteral stent placement, without ureteral lithotripsy. In percentage terms, the increase in mean calculus size in the groups (10%) was less significant than the increase in ureter density under the calculus (65%). Results. There was no relationship between the ureter density under the calculus and the residence time of the calculus in the ureter. However, there is a relationship between the residence time of the calculus and the anatomical narrowing of the ureter, which may affect the success of the procedure. Elevated creatinine levels in the group with initial ureteral stent placement may indicate impaired urine passage from the kidney. Conclusions. Routine measurement of the ureter density under the calculus during MSCT may be an additional parameter in determining the surgical treatment method.","PeriodicalId":123040,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2023-16-1-68-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urolithiasis is one of the most common diseases seen by urologists. In 28% of patients with kidney stones, the disease is symptomatic. The benefits of ureteral stone extraction include minimal invasiveness, a shorter postoperative recovery time, and a favourable safety profile. Aim: to compare and evaluate the relationship between the density of the ureter, the density of the calculus, its localization and the value of the creatinine level and predicting the success of ureterolithoextraction. Materials and methods. In total, 125 ureteral lithotripsy procedures were performed (42 in women and 83 in men). Initially, the patients were divided into two groups. In the first group, ureteral stone extraction was performed in 97 patients. The second group included 28 patients with ureteral stent placement, without ureteral lithotripsy. In percentage terms, the increase in mean calculus size in the groups (10%) was less significant than the increase in ureter density under the calculus (65%). Results. There was no relationship between the ureter density under the calculus and the residence time of the calculus in the ureter. However, there is a relationship between the residence time of the calculus and the anatomical narrowing of the ureter, which may affect the success of the procedure. Elevated creatinine levels in the group with initial ureteral stent placement may indicate impaired urine passage from the kidney. Conclusions. Routine measurement of the ureter density under the calculus during MSCT may be an additional parameter in determining the surgical treatment method.
输尿管结石术成功的预测因素。
尿石症是泌尿科医生最常见的疾病之一。28%的肾结石患者有症状。输尿管结石取出术的优点包括微创、术后恢复时间短和良好的安全性。目的:比较评价输尿管密度、结石密度及其定位与肌酐水平的关系,预测输尿管取石成功率。材料和方法。总共进行了125例输尿管碎石术(女性42例,男性83例)。最初,患者被分为两组。第一组97例患者行输尿管结石取出术。第二组包括输尿管支架放置的28例患者,没有输尿管碎石术。从百分比来看,各组平均结石大小的增加(10%)不如结石下输尿管密度的增加(65%)显著。结果。结石下输尿管密度与结石在输尿管内停留时间无关。然而,结石的停留时间与输尿管解剖狭窄之间存在关系,这可能会影响手术的成功。初始输尿管支架置入组肌酐水平升高可能提示肾脏尿液通过受损。结论。在MSCT期间,结石下输尿管密度的常规测量可能是确定手术治疗方法的另一个参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信