{"title":"Combining keystroke and mouse dynamics for continuous user authentication and identification","authors":"Soumik Mondal, Patrick A. H. Bours","doi":"10.1109/ISBA.2016.7477228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we analyze the performance of a continuous user authentication and identification system for a PC under various analysis techniques. We applied a novel identification technique called Pairwise User Coupling (PUC) on our own dataset for the analysis. This dataset is a combination of keystroke and mouse usage behaviour data. We obtained an identification accuracy of 62.2% for a closed-set experiment, where the system needs on average of 471 actions to detect an impostor. In case of an open-set experiment the Detection and Identification Rate (DIR) of 58.9% was obtained, where the system needs on average of 333 actions to detect an impostor.","PeriodicalId":198009,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Identity, Security and Behavior Analysis (ISBA)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Identity, Security and Behavior Analysis (ISBA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBA.2016.7477228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the performance of a continuous user authentication and identification system for a PC under various analysis techniques. We applied a novel identification technique called Pairwise User Coupling (PUC) on our own dataset for the analysis. This dataset is a combination of keystroke and mouse usage behaviour data. We obtained an identification accuracy of 62.2% for a closed-set experiment, where the system needs on average of 471 actions to detect an impostor. In case of an open-set experiment the Detection and Identification Rate (DIR) of 58.9% was obtained, where the system needs on average of 333 actions to detect an impostor.