Are Characteristics Covariances or Characteristics?

Lars Hornuf, C. Fieberg
{"title":"Are Characteristics Covariances or Characteristics?","authors":"Lars Hornuf, C. Fieberg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3633662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we shed more light on the covariances versus characteristics debate by investigating the explanatory power of the instrumented principal component analysis (IPCA), recently proposed by Kelly et al. (2019). They conclude that characteristics are covariances because there is no residual return predictability from characteristics above and beyond that in factor loadings. Our findings indicate that there is no residual return predictability from factor loadings above and beyond that in characteristics either. In particular, we find that stock returns are best explained by characteristics (characteristics are characteristics) and that a one-factor IPCA model is sufficient to explain stock risk (characteristics are covariances). We therefore conclude that characteristics are covariances or characteristics, depending on whether the goal is to explain stock returns or risk.","PeriodicalId":179699,"journal":{"name":"CESifo: Monetary Policy & International Finance (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CESifo: Monetary Policy & International Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3633662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, we shed more light on the covariances versus characteristics debate by investigating the explanatory power of the instrumented principal component analysis (IPCA), recently proposed by Kelly et al. (2019). They conclude that characteristics are covariances because there is no residual return predictability from characteristics above and beyond that in factor loadings. Our findings indicate that there is no residual return predictability from factor loadings above and beyond that in characteristics either. In particular, we find that stock returns are best explained by characteristics (characteristics are characteristics) and that a one-factor IPCA model is sufficient to explain stock risk (characteristics are covariances). We therefore conclude that characteristics are covariances or characteristics, depending on whether the goal is to explain stock returns or risk.
特征是协方差还是特征?
在本文中,我们通过调查Kelly等人(2019)最近提出的仪器主成分分析(IPCA)的解释力,进一步阐明了协方差与特征之争。他们得出的结论是,特征是协方差,因为在因子负载中,没有剩余回报可预测性。我们的研究结果表明,没有剩余收益的可预测性,从因子负荷以上和超出的特征。特别是,我们发现股票收益最好用特征来解释(特征就是特征),单因素IPCA模型足以解释股票风险(特征就是协方差)。因此,我们得出结论,特征是协方差或特征,这取决于目标是解释股票收益还是风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信