The PMIP4-CMIP6 Last Glacial Maximum experiments: preliminary results and comparison with the PMIP3-CMIP5 simulations

M. Kageyama, S. Harrison, M. Kapsch, M. Löfverström, J. Lora, Uwe, Mikolajewicz, S. Sherriff-Tadano, T. Vadsaria, A. Abe‐Ouchi, N. Bouttes, Deepak, Chandan, A. Legrande, F. Lhardy, Gerrit Lohmann, P. Morozova, Rumi, Ohgaito, W. Peltier, A. Quiquet, D. Roche, Xiaoxu Shi, Andreas, Schmittner, J. Tierney, E. Volodin
{"title":"The PMIP4-CMIP6 Last Glacial Maximum experiments: preliminary results and comparison with the PMIP3-CMIP5 simulations","authors":"M. Kageyama, S. Harrison, M. Kapsch, M. Löfverström, J. Lora, Uwe, Mikolajewicz, S. Sherriff-Tadano, T. Vadsaria, A. Abe‐Ouchi, N. Bouttes, Deepak, Chandan, A. Legrande, F. Lhardy, Gerrit Lohmann, P. Morozova, Rumi, Ohgaito, W. Peltier, A. Quiquet, D. Roche, Xiaoxu Shi, Andreas, Schmittner, J. Tierney, E. Volodin","doi":"10.5194/cp-2019-169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n <p>The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, ~21,000 years ago) has been a major focus for evaluating how well state-of-the-art climate models simulate climate changes as large as those expected in the future using paleoclimate reconstructions. A new generation of climate models have been used to generate LGM simulations as part of the Palaeoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) contributionto CMIP6. Here we provide a preliminary analysis and evaluation of the results of these LGM experiments and compare them with the previous generation of simulations (PMIP3-CMIP5). We show that the PMIP4-CMIP6 are globally less cold and less dry than the PMIP3-CMIP5 simulations, most probably because of the use of a more realistic specification of the northern hemisphere ice sheets in the latest simulations although changes in model configuration may also contribute to this. There are important differences in both atmospheric and ocean circulation between the two sets of experiments, with the northern and southern jet streams being more poleward and the changes in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation being less pronounced in the PMIP4-CMIP6 simulations than in the PMIP3-CMIP5 simulations. Changes in simulated precipitation patterns are influenced by both temperature and circulation changes. Differences in simulated climate between individual models remain large so, although there are differences in the average behaviour across the two ensembles, the new simulation results are not fundamentally different from the PMIP3-CMIP5 results. Evaluation of large-scale climate features, such as land-sea contrast and polar amplification, confirms that the models capture these well and within the uncertainty of the palaeoclimate reconstructions. Nevertheless, regional climate changes are less well simulated: the models underestimate extratropical cooling, particularly in winter, and precipitation changes. The spatial patterns of increased precipitation associated with changes in the jet streams are also poorly captured. However, changes in the tropics are more realistic, particularly the changes in tropical temperatures over the oceans. Although these results are preliminary in nature, because of the limited number of LGM simulations currently available, they nevertheless point to the utility of using paleoclimate simulations to understand the mechanisms of climate change and evaluate model performance.</p>\n","PeriodicalId":263057,"journal":{"name":"Climate of The Past Discussions","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate of The Past Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2019-169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, ~21,000 years ago) has been a major focus for evaluating how well state-of-the-art climate models simulate climate changes as large as those expected in the future using paleoclimate reconstructions. A new generation of climate models have been used to generate LGM simulations as part of the Palaeoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) contributionto CMIP6. Here we provide a preliminary analysis and evaluation of the results of these LGM experiments and compare them with the previous generation of simulations (PMIP3-CMIP5). We show that the PMIP4-CMIP6 are globally less cold and less dry than the PMIP3-CMIP5 simulations, most probably because of the use of a more realistic specification of the northern hemisphere ice sheets in the latest simulations although changes in model configuration may also contribute to this. There are important differences in both atmospheric and ocean circulation between the two sets of experiments, with the northern and southern jet streams being more poleward and the changes in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation being less pronounced in the PMIP4-CMIP6 simulations than in the PMIP3-CMIP5 simulations. Changes in simulated precipitation patterns are influenced by both temperature and circulation changes. Differences in simulated climate between individual models remain large so, although there are differences in the average behaviour across the two ensembles, the new simulation results are not fundamentally different from the PMIP3-CMIP5 results. Evaluation of large-scale climate features, such as land-sea contrast and polar amplification, confirms that the models capture these well and within the uncertainty of the palaeoclimate reconstructions. Nevertheless, regional climate changes are less well simulated: the models underestimate extratropical cooling, particularly in winter, and precipitation changes. The spatial patterns of increased precipitation associated with changes in the jet streams are also poorly captured. However, changes in the tropics are more realistic, particularly the changes in tropical temperatures over the oceans. Although these results are preliminary in nature, because of the limited number of LGM simulations currently available, they nevertheless point to the utility of using paleoclimate simulations to understand the mechanisms of climate change and evaluate model performance.

PMIP4-CMIP6末次盛冰期试验:初步结果及与PMIP3-CMIP5模拟的比较
末次盛冰期(LGM,约21000年前)一直是评估最先进的气候模式如何很好地模拟气候变化的主要焦点,这些气候变化与使用古气候重建预测的未来气候变化一样大。作为对CMIP6贡献的古气候模式比对项目(PMIP)的一部分,新一代气候模式已被用于生成LGM模拟。本文对这些LGM实验结果进行了初步分析和评价,并与上一代模拟(PMIP3-CMIP5)进行了比较。我们发现,与PMIP3-CMIP5模拟相比,PMIP4-CMIP6模拟在全球范围内更少冷,更少干,这很可能是因为在最新的模拟中使用了更现实的北半球冰盖规格,尽管模式配置的变化也可能对此有所贡献。PMIP4-CMIP6模拟与PMIP3-CMIP5模拟相比,北、南急流偏极,大西洋经向翻转环流变化不明显。模拟降水型的变化受到温度和环流变化的影响。单个模式之间模拟气候的差异仍然很大,因此,尽管两个组合的平均行为存在差异,但新的模拟结果与PMIP3-CMIP5的结果并没有根本的不同。对大尺度气候特征(如陆海对比和极地放大)的评估证实,这些模式在古气候重建的不确定性范围内很好地捕获了这些特征。然而,区域气候变化的模拟效果较差:模式低估了温带降温,特别是冬季的降温和降水变化。与急流变化相关的降水增加的空间格局也没有得到很好的捕捉。然而,热带地区的变化更为现实,特别是海洋上空热带温度的变化。虽然这些结果本质上是初步的,但由于目前可用的LGM模拟数量有限,它们仍然指出了使用古气候模拟来理解气候变化机制和评估模式性能的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信