{"title":"BANK PROFILE AND STRUCTURE AS DETERMINANTS OF MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGES —SEASONAL CHANGES AND MANAGEMENT","authors":"P. Armitage, K. Lattmann, N. Kneebone, I. Harris","doi":"10.1002/RRR.657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Management and restoration procedures in rivers frequently have a major influence on the bank and marginal zone, depending on the timing of disturbance and the eventual structure of the bank. This study examines changes in macroinvertebrate communities in four different bank types at 3-weekly intervals throughout a year. The banks differed in their profile and in their structure: shallow sloping and vegetated, stepped shallow profile, steep profile (eroded soil bank), and iron revetments. Velocity patterns over the year showed much variability, both between and within bank types ranging from standing water in the summer to velocities in excess of 0.9 m s -1 in the winter. The shallow-sloping vegetated site supported a total of 115 taxa, in contrast to the artificial iron revetment, on which only 32 taxa were recorded. Total abundances were five to six times greater in the shallow vegetated sites compared with the steeply sloped and artificial banks. Highest abundances were recorded in the late spring (May/June) and most taxa were found in August and September. Fluctuations in both abundance and number of taxa were least on the reveted bank. Ordination of the fauna/site matrix revealed a seasonal separation with specific winter and summer communities. The results suggest that the bankside is a dynamic environment where communities change in relation to growth of bankside vegetation and its concomitant effect on flow. The implications of these findings to management activities and restoration procedures are discussed.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/RRR.657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43
Abstract
Management and restoration procedures in rivers frequently have a major influence on the bank and marginal zone, depending on the timing of disturbance and the eventual structure of the bank. This study examines changes in macroinvertebrate communities in four different bank types at 3-weekly intervals throughout a year. The banks differed in their profile and in their structure: shallow sloping and vegetated, stepped shallow profile, steep profile (eroded soil bank), and iron revetments. Velocity patterns over the year showed much variability, both between and within bank types ranging from standing water in the summer to velocities in excess of 0.9 m s -1 in the winter. The shallow-sloping vegetated site supported a total of 115 taxa, in contrast to the artificial iron revetment, on which only 32 taxa were recorded. Total abundances were five to six times greater in the shallow vegetated sites compared with the steeply sloped and artificial banks. Highest abundances were recorded in the late spring (May/June) and most taxa were found in August and September. Fluctuations in both abundance and number of taxa were least on the reveted bank. Ordination of the fauna/site matrix revealed a seasonal separation with specific winter and summer communities. The results suggest that the bankside is a dynamic environment where communities change in relation to growth of bankside vegetation and its concomitant effect on flow. The implications of these findings to management activities and restoration procedures are discussed.
河流的管理和恢复过程经常对河岸和边缘地带产生重大影响,这取决于扰动的时间和河岸的最终结构。本研究在一年中每隔3周检查四种不同银行类型中大型无脊椎动物群落的变化。河岸的轮廓和结构各不相同:浅斜坡和植被,阶梯式浅剖面,陡峭剖面(侵蚀土壤河岸)和铁护岸。从夏季的死水到冬季超过0.9 m s -1的速度,全年的流速模式在不同类型的河岸之间和内部都表现出很大的变化。浅坡植被样地共有115个类群,而人工铁护岸样地仅有32个类群。浅层植被地的总丰度是陡坡和人工河岸的5 ~ 6倍。丰度最高的季节为晚春(5 / 6月),最多的分类群出现在8月和9月。坡岸的类群丰度和数量波动最小。动物群/立地矩阵排序显示出季节性分离,有特定的冬季和夏季群落。结果表明,河岸是一个动态环境,群落的变化与河岸植被的生长及其对流量的影响有关。讨论了这些发现对管理活动和恢复程序的影响。