Court Cases, Cultural Expertise, and “Female Genital Mutilation” in Europe

R. Mestre, S. Johnsdotter
{"title":"Court Cases, Cultural Expertise, and “Female Genital Mutilation” in Europe","authors":"R. Mestre, S. Johnsdotter","doi":"10.1108/S1059-433720190000078006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis chapter discusses adjudication, expertise, and cultural difference as it appears in criminal court cases concerning female genital cutting (FGM) in the EU, as reported in a 2015 comparative overview. It begins with the distinction between typical and atypical FGM cases; a distinction that connects court cases to the cultural realities of the practicing communities, suggesting that the lack of cultural knowledge can cause unnecessary suffering to families and/or individuals who wrongly undergo prosecution in alleged FGM cases. A contrario, the intervention of experts in FGM court cases could be a positive approach to assessing the legitimacy of public intervention in certain cases.","PeriodicalId":304111,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Expertise and Socio-Legal Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Expertise and Socio-Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720190000078006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract This chapter discusses adjudication, expertise, and cultural difference as it appears in criminal court cases concerning female genital cutting (FGM) in the EU, as reported in a 2015 comparative overview. It begins with the distinction between typical and atypical FGM cases; a distinction that connects court cases to the cultural realities of the practicing communities, suggesting that the lack of cultural knowledge can cause unnecessary suffering to families and/or individuals who wrongly undergo prosecution in alleged FGM cases. A contrario, the intervention of experts in FGM court cases could be a positive approach to assessing the legitimacy of public intervention in certain cases.
欧洲的法庭案件、文化专业知识和“女性生殖器切割”
本章讨论了2015年比较综述中报道的欧盟女性生殖器切割(FGM)刑事法庭案件中的裁决、专业知识和文化差异。首先要区分典型和非典型女性生殖器切割病例;这一区别将法庭案件与实践社区的文化现实联系起来,表明缺乏文化知识可能会给在所谓的女性生殖器切割案件中被错误起诉的家庭和/或个人造成不必要的痛苦。相反,专家介入女性外阴残割法庭案件可能是评估某些案件中公众干预合法性的一种积极方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信