UK and Irish locations from which geological or palaeontologcal specimens are known to be prone to pyrite oxidation

Geological Curator Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.55468/gc404
N. Larkin, C. Buttler, K. Miles
{"title":"UK and Irish locations from which geological or palaeontologcal specimens are known to be prone to pyrite oxidation","authors":"N. Larkin, C. Buttler, K. Miles","doi":"10.55468/gc404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pyrite oxidation (or pyrite decay) has been a problem in museum collections for many years. The damage to specimens can include total loss of the object and its label. There is no cure: the changes cannot be reversed but the process can be halted. Preventing pyrite oxidation in the first place is obviously preferable but maintaining the appropriate environmental conditions in a large storage area can be very difficult to achieve and monitoring the whole collection regularly for signs of pyrite decay may not be practicable. Therefore it would be useful for curators to know which specimens in their collection are most likely to suffer from pyrite decay. Whilst there is a great deal of literature published on the mechanisms of pyrite oxidation and its treatment, there has been very little describing which sorts of specimens are prone to the process. Alist of sites in the UK and Ireland from which problematic material is known is presented, with indications of what specimens from these sites are likely to suffer the most. This data has been crowd-sourced from curators, conservators, collectors and enthusiasts from around the UK and further afield. It is not definitive but is a starting point and can be added to over time. The most important specimens from sites identified on this list can be stored in appropriate environmental conditions and/or regularly monitored. They can also be digitally imaged or physically replicated through casting or 3D printing to preserve a record in case the worst should happen in the future.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Curator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pyrite oxidation (or pyrite decay) has been a problem in museum collections for many years. The damage to specimens can include total loss of the object and its label. There is no cure: the changes cannot be reversed but the process can be halted. Preventing pyrite oxidation in the first place is obviously preferable but maintaining the appropriate environmental conditions in a large storage area can be very difficult to achieve and monitoring the whole collection regularly for signs of pyrite decay may not be practicable. Therefore it would be useful for curators to know which specimens in their collection are most likely to suffer from pyrite decay. Whilst there is a great deal of literature published on the mechanisms of pyrite oxidation and its treatment, there has been very little describing which sorts of specimens are prone to the process. Alist of sites in the UK and Ireland from which problematic material is known is presented, with indications of what specimens from these sites are likely to suffer the most. This data has been crowd-sourced from curators, conservators, collectors and enthusiasts from around the UK and further afield. It is not definitive but is a starting point and can be added to over time. The most important specimens from sites identified on this list can be stored in appropriate environmental conditions and/or regularly monitored. They can also be digitally imaged or physically replicated through casting or 3D printing to preserve a record in case the worst should happen in the future.
英国和爱尔兰的地质或古生物标本已知容易发生黄铁矿氧化的地点
黄铁矿氧化(或黄铁矿衰变)多年来一直是博物馆藏品中的一个问题。对标本的损害包括物体及其标签的完全丢失。这是无法治愈的:变化无法逆转,但进程可以停止。首先防止黄铁矿氧化显然是可取的,但在一个大的储存区域保持适当的环境条件可能很难实现,定期监测整个收集的黄铁矿腐烂的迹象可能是不切实际的。因此,对于馆长来说,了解他们收藏的哪些标本最有可能遭受黄铁矿腐蚀是有用的。虽然有大量的文献发表的机制的黄铁矿氧化及其处理,有很少的描述,哪些种类的标本是倾向于这一过程。列出了英国和爱尔兰已知的有问题材料的地点,并指出了这些地点的哪些标本可能受到的影响最大。这些数据来自英国各地和更远的地方的策展人、文物保护者、收藏家和爱好者。它不是决定性的,但它是一个起点,可以随着时间的推移而增加。在此清单上确定的地点中,最重要的标本可以保存在适当的环境条件下和/或定期监测。它们也可以通过数字成像或通过铸造或3D打印进行物理复制,以保存记录,以防未来发生最坏的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信