Sustainable Development in the WTO Institutions and Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM)

M. C. Segger
{"title":"Sustainable Development in the WTO Institutions and Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM)","authors":"M. C. Segger","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198831341.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter begins with discussions on the state of sustainable development in the World Trade Organization (WTO), noting that progress on integrating social and environmental considerations into WTO law and policy remains poor. It then discusses the WTO’s Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM), and how its role has evolved from being a WTO review mechanism focused on economic policies alone, to providing a platform for discussions on trade and sustainable development. These discussions have revealed that WTO member States belong to one of three main schools of thought; First, some WTO members remain adamant that sustainable development is purely a domestic policy issue, or argue that all social and environmental considerations, including the potential impacts of trade, should remain only in the domestic law and policy arena; Second, several WTO members such as Canada and the US recognize openly that sustainable development is an objective of the WTO Agreements, and note that as such, it is relevant to the interpretation of the treaties; Third, further WTO members such as the European Commission also recognize that trade will not automatically deliver on a sustainable development objective, and link their commitment to the objective with the need for better integration of environmental and social considerations into trade and development policy.","PeriodicalId":231279,"journal":{"name":"Crafting Trade and Investment Accords for Sustainable Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crafting Trade and Investment Accords for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198831341.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter begins with discussions on the state of sustainable development in the World Trade Organization (WTO), noting that progress on integrating social and environmental considerations into WTO law and policy remains poor. It then discusses the WTO’s Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM), and how its role has evolved from being a WTO review mechanism focused on economic policies alone, to providing a platform for discussions on trade and sustainable development. These discussions have revealed that WTO member States belong to one of three main schools of thought; First, some WTO members remain adamant that sustainable development is purely a domestic policy issue, or argue that all social and environmental considerations, including the potential impacts of trade, should remain only in the domestic law and policy arena; Second, several WTO members such as Canada and the US recognize openly that sustainable development is an objective of the WTO Agreements, and note that as such, it is relevant to the interpretation of the treaties; Third, further WTO members such as the European Commission also recognize that trade will not automatically deliver on a sustainable development objective, and link their commitment to the objective with the need for better integration of environmental and social considerations into trade and development policy.
WTO机构和贸易政策审议机制中的可持续发展
本章首先讨论世界贸易组织(世贸组织)的可持续发展状况,并指出在将社会和环境考虑纳入世贸组织法律和政策方面的进展仍然很差。然后讨论了世贸组织的贸易政策审议机制(TPRM),以及它的作用如何从一个只关注经济政策的世贸组织审议机制演变为一个讨论贸易和可持续发展的平台。这些讨论表明,WTO成员国属于三个主要思想流派之一;首先,一些世贸组织成员坚持认为可持续发展纯粹是一个国内政策问题,或者认为所有社会和环境方面的考虑,包括贸易的潜在影响,应该只留在国内法律和政策领域;其次,一些世贸组织成员,如加拿大和美国,公开承认可持续发展是世贸组织协议的一个目标,并指出,因此,它与条约的解释有关;第三,欧盟委员会等世贸组织成员也认识到,贸易不会自动实现可持续发展目标,并将其对可持续发展目标的承诺与更好地将环境和社会因素纳入贸易和发展政策的需要联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信