GRAMATIČKA KATEGORIJA LICA U DEKONSTRUKCIJI JAVNOG DISKURSA U SRBIJI

Ilijana R. Čutura
{"title":"GRAMATIČKA KATEGORIJA LICA U DEKONSTRUKCIJI JAVNOG DISKURSA U SRBIJI","authors":"Ilijana R. Čutura","doi":"10.46793/zip21.205c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the analysis of the category of grammatical person in shaping public political discourse in Serbia. The material is excerpted from government representatives’ spoken statements (interviews, media conferences etc.) regarding environmental problems that have escalated in 2021, especially public debate about Lithium exploration and possible mining. In the paper, we specifically analyzed the use of the first person singular and the first person plural from the aspect of reference, information transparency and emotional effect. The analysis of the material has shown that the first person singular is not frequent except in the public speeches of the president of the state. This is opposite to the aspiration of politicians to imply their involvement in institutional action and decision-making. However, in this socio-political context, the first person singular strengthens the leadership position of the speaker, distances the speaker from politicians in general and increases solidarity with ’non-politicians’, i.e. citizens. The first person plural provides referential ambiguity and enables the speaker to shift among different collective identities.","PeriodicalId":441367,"journal":{"name":"IDENTITETSKE promene: srpski jezik i književnost u doba tranzicije","volume":"05 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDENTITETSKE promene: srpski jezik i književnost u doba tranzicije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/zip21.205c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper deals with the analysis of the category of grammatical person in shaping public political discourse in Serbia. The material is excerpted from government representatives’ spoken statements (interviews, media conferences etc.) regarding environmental problems that have escalated in 2021, especially public debate about Lithium exploration and possible mining. In the paper, we specifically analyzed the use of the first person singular and the first person plural from the aspect of reference, information transparency and emotional effect. The analysis of the material has shown that the first person singular is not frequent except in the public speeches of the president of the state. This is opposite to the aspiration of politicians to imply their involvement in institutional action and decision-making. However, in this socio-political context, the first person singular strengthens the leadership position of the speaker, distances the speaker from politicians in general and increases solidarity with ’non-politicians’, i.e. citizens. The first person plural provides referential ambiguity and enables the speaker to shift among different collective identities.
本文分析了塞尔维亚公共政治话语中语法人的范畴。这些材料摘自政府代表关于2021年升级的环境问题的口头声明(采访、媒体会议等),特别是关于锂勘探和可能开采的公众辩论。在本文中,我们具体分析了第一人称单数和第一人称复数在参考、信息透明度和情感效果方面的使用。对材料的分析表明,除了在国家总统的公开演讲中,第一人称单数并不常见。这与政治家暗示他们参与机构行动和决策的愿望背道而驰。然而,在这种社会政治背景下,第一人称单数加强了说话人的领导地位,使说话人与一般的政治家保持距离,并增加了与“非政治家”(即公民)的团结。第一人称复数提供了指称歧义,使说话人能够在不同的集体身份之间转换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信