An alternative method of SNP inclusion to develop a generalized polygenic risk score analysis across Alzheimer's disease cohorts

K. Brookes, Tamar Guetta‐Baranés, Alan Thomas, K. Morgan
{"title":"An alternative method of SNP inclusion to develop a generalized polygenic risk score analysis across Alzheimer's disease cohorts","authors":"K. Brookes, Tamar Guetta‐Baranés, Alan Thomas, K. Morgan","doi":"10.3389/frdem.2023.1120206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have great clinical potential for detecting late-onset diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), allowing the identification of those most at risk years before the symptoms present. Although many studies use various and complicated machine learning algorithms to determine the best discriminatory values for PRSs, few studies look at the commonality of the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) utilized in these models.This investigation focussed on identifying SNPs that tag blocks of linkage disequilibrium across the genome, allowing for a generalized PRS model across cohorts and genotyping panels. PRS modeling was conducted on five AD development cohorts, with the best discriminatory models exploring for a commonality of linkage disequilibrium clumps. Clumps that contributed to the discrimination of cases from controls that occurred in multiple cohorts were used to create a generalized model of PRS, which was then tested in the five development cohorts and three further AD cohorts.The model developed provided a discriminability accuracy average of over 70% in multiple AD cohorts and included variants of several well-known AD risk genes.A key element of devising a polygenic risk score that can be used in the clinical setting is one that has consistency in the SNPs that are used to calculate the score; this study demonstrates that using a model based on commonality of association findings rather than meta-analyses may prove useful.","PeriodicalId":408305,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dementia","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2023.1120206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have great clinical potential for detecting late-onset diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), allowing the identification of those most at risk years before the symptoms present. Although many studies use various and complicated machine learning algorithms to determine the best discriminatory values for PRSs, few studies look at the commonality of the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) utilized in these models.This investigation focussed on identifying SNPs that tag blocks of linkage disequilibrium across the genome, allowing for a generalized PRS model across cohorts and genotyping panels. PRS modeling was conducted on five AD development cohorts, with the best discriminatory models exploring for a commonality of linkage disequilibrium clumps. Clumps that contributed to the discrimination of cases from controls that occurred in multiple cohorts were used to create a generalized model of PRS, which was then tested in the five development cohorts and three further AD cohorts.The model developed provided a discriminability accuracy average of over 70% in multiple AD cohorts and included variants of several well-known AD risk genes.A key element of devising a polygenic risk score that can be used in the clinical setting is one that has consistency in the SNPs that are used to calculate the score; this study demonstrates that using a model based on commonality of association findings rather than meta-analyses may prove useful.
在阿尔茨海默病队列中开发一种通用多基因风险评分分析的SNP纳入的替代方法
多基因风险评分(PRSs)在检测晚发性疾病(如阿尔茨海默病(AD))方面具有巨大的临床潜力,可以在症状出现前几年识别出那些风险最大的疾病。尽管许多研究使用各种复杂的机器学习算法来确定PRSs的最佳区分值,但很少有研究关注这些模型中使用的单核苷酸多态性(snp)的共性。这项研究的重点是识别标记整个基因组连锁不平衡块的snp,从而允许跨队列和基因分型小组的广义PRS模型。对5个AD发展队列进行了PRS建模,其中最好的区分模型探索了连锁不平衡团块的共性。在多个队列中,有助于区分对照病例的团块被用于创建一个广义的PRS模型,然后在五个发展队列和另外三个AD队列中进行测试。该模型在多个阿尔茨海默病队列中提供了平均超过70%的判别准确度,并包括几个已知的阿尔茨海默病风险基因的变体。设计可用于临床环境的多基因风险评分的一个关键因素是用于计算评分的snp具有一致性;这项研究表明,使用基于关联发现共性的模型而不是元分析可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信