Children at home on mechanical assistive devices and their families: a retrospective study.

Maternal-child nursing journal Pub Date : 1990-01-01
P D Williams, A R Williams, C Griggs
{"title":"Children at home on mechanical assistive devices and their families: a retrospective study.","authors":"P D Williams,&nbsp;A R Williams,&nbsp;C Griggs","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few assessments have been done of the influence of caregiver and family interactions on the developmental status of children discharged on mechanical assistive devices. The ages of the 25 children in this study ranged from 2-30 months. Seven were on apnea monitors at the time of the home interviews, and 18 had been off the monitors for 18 months or more. Mothers were administered six questionnaires: Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES III), Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire, Families Coping Strategies (FCOPES), Self-Esteem Scale, Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment, and the Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Scale (REEL). Results on the FACES III revealed that families were not rigid in adaptability; 61% were chaotic, and 33% were balanced. On the cohesion scale, 25% were disengaged, 30% were enmeshed, and 45% were balanced. On the FCOPES, and it's subscales, 36-40% of the respondents scored below the established norms. Social support was strongly correlated with Cohesion and Adaptability (r = .47, .67), HOME scores correlated with Self-Esteem (r = .47) and FCOPES Reframe scale (r = .45), and REEL scores correlated with Social Support (r = .47, .52). Path-analysis revealed two paths: help-seeking behaviors of the mother and the child-mother interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":76125,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-child nursing journal","volume":"19 4","pages":"297-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal-child nursing journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few assessments have been done of the influence of caregiver and family interactions on the developmental status of children discharged on mechanical assistive devices. The ages of the 25 children in this study ranged from 2-30 months. Seven were on apnea monitors at the time of the home interviews, and 18 had been off the monitors for 18 months or more. Mothers were administered six questionnaires: Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES III), Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire, Families Coping Strategies (FCOPES), Self-Esteem Scale, Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment, and the Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Scale (REEL). Results on the FACES III revealed that families were not rigid in adaptability; 61% were chaotic, and 33% were balanced. On the cohesion scale, 25% were disengaged, 30% were enmeshed, and 45% were balanced. On the FCOPES, and it's subscales, 36-40% of the respondents scored below the established norms. Social support was strongly correlated with Cohesion and Adaptability (r = .47, .67), HOME scores correlated with Self-Esteem (r = .47) and FCOPES Reframe scale (r = .45), and REEL scores correlated with Social Support (r = .47, .52). Path-analysis revealed two paths: help-seeking behaviors of the mother and the child-mother interactions.

儿童在家使用机械辅助装置及其家庭:一项回顾性研究。
关于照顾者和家庭互动对使用机械辅助装置出院儿童发育状况影响的评估很少。在这项研究中,25名儿童的年龄从2-30个月不等。在进行家庭访谈时,有7人正在使用呼吸暂停监测器,18人在18个月或更长时间内没有使用监测器。采用家庭适应与凝聚力评价量表(FACES III)、Duke-UNC功能社会支持量表(Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire)、家庭应对策略量表(FCOPES)、自尊量表、家庭环境观察量表(Home Observation for Measurement of Environment)和接受-表达性突发语言量表(REEL)进行问卷调查。face III的结果显示,家庭的适应性并不僵化;61%是混乱的,33%是平衡的。在凝聚力量表上,25%的人不投入,30%的人投入,45%的人平衡。在FCOPES及其子量表中,36% -40%的受访者得分低于既定标准。社会支持与凝聚力和适应性呈显著正相关(r = 0.47, 0.67), HOME得分与自尊(r = 0.47)和FCOPES重构量表(r = 0.45)呈显著正相关,REEL得分与社会支持呈显著正相关(r = 0.47, 0.52)。路径分析揭示了母亲寻求帮助行为和母子互动的两条路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信