Hospital Readiness in Implementing Phase One Global Budget Trial in Sumedang District

W. Winarti, Budi Setiawan Djamhur
{"title":"Hospital Readiness in Implementing Phase One Global Budget Trial in Sumedang District","authors":"W. Winarti, Budi Setiawan Djamhur","doi":"10.46336/ijbesd.v4i2.428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BPJS Kesehatan initiated an operational study on the implementation of the INA-CBGs and Global Budget mixed- method hospital payment system. Since 2018, trials have been carried out in 5 districts and 30 hospitals. In contrast to the INA-CBGS system, the Global budget is a method of hospital funding paid in advance by BPJS Kesehatan for all services/activities for one year that in its calculation it will consider the number of services in the previous year, upcoming activities to be carried out, and hospital performance. The trial will carry out in three stages, namely the Non-Risk Global Budget, the Partial Risk Global Budget and the Full Risk Global Budget. In its implementation, although the global budget has been initiated since 2018, the model or formulation in implementing the global budget policy still requires further study. The purpose of this study is to see the process of implementing the trial and obstacles arises to find the most suitable implementation model. The research method used is a qualitative method with a case study approach. The research subjects were Sumedang District General Hospital, Pakuwon Hospital and Harapan Keluarga Hospital. Since September 2020 they begin to receive real quarterly payments with a non-risk stage to hospitals. The amount of withhold used in this study is 30%. The amount of the budget is calculated based on the calculation of the last three years from the hospital's financial records. Preliminary results, shows that this trial is still ongoing and to continue the payment system for the second stage, the hospital withdrawn their participation is this program as there are discrepancies in the way of calculating finances in setting the budget, determining of the amount of risk that must be borne by both parties and the withhold policy. which is considered burdensome by the hospital, especially for regional general hospitals.","PeriodicalId":441425,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v4i2.428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BPJS Kesehatan initiated an operational study on the implementation of the INA-CBGs and Global Budget mixed- method hospital payment system. Since 2018, trials have been carried out in 5 districts and 30 hospitals. In contrast to the INA-CBGS system, the Global budget is a method of hospital funding paid in advance by BPJS Kesehatan for all services/activities for one year that in its calculation it will consider the number of services in the previous year, upcoming activities to be carried out, and hospital performance. The trial will carry out in three stages, namely the Non-Risk Global Budget, the Partial Risk Global Budget and the Full Risk Global Budget. In its implementation, although the global budget has been initiated since 2018, the model or formulation in implementing the global budget policy still requires further study. The purpose of this study is to see the process of implementing the trial and obstacles arises to find the most suitable implementation model. The research method used is a qualitative method with a case study approach. The research subjects were Sumedang District General Hospital, Pakuwon Hospital and Harapan Keluarga Hospital. Since September 2020 they begin to receive real quarterly payments with a non-risk stage to hospitals. The amount of withhold used in this study is 30%. The amount of the budget is calculated based on the calculation of the last three years from the hospital's financial records. Preliminary results, shows that this trial is still ongoing and to continue the payment system for the second stage, the hospital withdrawn their participation is this program as there are discrepancies in the way of calculating finances in setting the budget, determining of the amount of risk that must be borne by both parties and the withhold policy. which is considered burdensome by the hospital, especially for regional general hospitals.
苏梅当区实施第一阶段全球预算试验的医院准备情况
BPJS Kesehatan发起了一项关于实施INA-CBGs和全球预算混合方法医院支付系统的业务研究。2018年以来,已在5个区、30家医院开展试点。与INA-CBGS系统不同的是,全球预算是一种由BPJS Kesehatan为一年的所有服务/活动预先支付医院资金的方法,在计算时将考虑上一年的服务数量、即将开展的活动和医院业绩。试验将分三个阶段进行,即无风险全球预算、部分风险全球预算和完全风险全球预算。在执行过程中,虽然全球预算自2018年开始启动,但全球预算政策的执行模式或制定仍有待进一步研究。本研究的目的是了解实施试验的过程和出现的障碍,以找到最合适的实施模式。使用的研究方法是一个定性的方法与案例研究的方法。研究对象为Sumedang区总医院、Pakuwon医院和Harapan Keluarga医院。自2020年9月起,他们开始在无风险阶段向医院收取实际季度付款。本研究中使用的预扣量为30%。预算金额是根据医院最近三年的财务记录计算得出的。初步结果显示,该试验仍在进行中,并将继续第二阶段的支付系统,医院退出参与该计划,因为在制定预算,确定双方必须承担的风险金额和预扣政策方面的财务计算方式存在差异。医院认为这是一种负担,特别是对地区综合医院来说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信