How Human Likeness, Gender and Ethnicity affect Elders’Acceptance of Assistive Robots

A. Esposito, T. Amorese, M. Cuciniello, M. Riviello, G. Cordasco
{"title":"How Human Likeness, Gender and Ethnicity affect Elders’Acceptance of Assistive Robots","authors":"A. Esposito, T. Amorese, M. Cuciniello, M. Riviello, G. Cordasco","doi":"10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigates the extent to which robots’ 1) degree of human likeness, 2) gender and 3) ethnicity affect elders’ attitude towards using robots as healthcare assistants. To this aim 2 groups of 45 seniors, aged 65 + years, were asked to watch video clips showing three speaking female and male robots, respectively. Each set of stimuli consisted in 2 androids, one with Caucasian and one with Asian aspect, and 1 humanoid robot. After each video clip elders were asked to assess, through the Robot Acceptance Questionnaire (RAQ) their willingness to interact with them, as well as robots’ Pragmatic, Hedonic and Attractive qualities. Through this investigation it was found that male seniors were more proactive than female ones in their attitude toward robots showing more willingness to interact with them and attributing more positive scores to robots’ qualities. It was also observed that androids were clearly more preferred than humanoid robots no matter their gender. Finally, seniors’ preferences were for female android robots with Asian traits and male android with Caucasian traits suggesting that both gender and ethnical features are intermingled in defining robot’s appearance that generate seniors’ acceptance.","PeriodicalId":132917,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS)","volume":"228 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The present study investigates the extent to which robots’ 1) degree of human likeness, 2) gender and 3) ethnicity affect elders’ attitude towards using robots as healthcare assistants. To this aim 2 groups of 45 seniors, aged 65 + years, were asked to watch video clips showing three speaking female and male robots, respectively. Each set of stimuli consisted in 2 androids, one with Caucasian and one with Asian aspect, and 1 humanoid robot. After each video clip elders were asked to assess, through the Robot Acceptance Questionnaire (RAQ) their willingness to interact with them, as well as robots’ Pragmatic, Hedonic and Attractive qualities. Through this investigation it was found that male seniors were more proactive than female ones in their attitude toward robots showing more willingness to interact with them and attributing more positive scores to robots’ qualities. It was also observed that androids were clearly more preferred than humanoid robots no matter their gender. Finally, seniors’ preferences were for female android robots with Asian traits and male android with Caucasian traits suggesting that both gender and ethnical features are intermingled in defining robot’s appearance that generate seniors’ acceptance.
人类的相似性、性别和种族如何影响老年人对辅助机器人的接受
本研究调查了机器人在多大程度上与人类相似,2)性别和3)种族影响老年人对使用机器人作为医疗助手的态度。为此,研究人员要求两组45名65岁以上的老年人分别观看三个会说话的女性和男性机器人的视频片段。每组刺激物包括2个机器人(高加索人和亚洲人各1个)和1个人形机器人。在每个视频片段之后,老年人被要求通过机器人接受度问卷(RAQ)来评估他们与机器人互动的意愿,以及机器人的实用主义、享乐主义和吸引力。通过调查发现,男性老年人对机器人的态度比女性老年人更主动,表现出更愿意与机器人互动,并对机器人的品质给予更多的积极评价。研究还发现,无论性别如何,机器人显然比人形机器人更受欢迎。最后,老年人对具有亚洲特征的女性机器人和具有高加索特征的男性机器人的偏好表明,性别和种族特征在定义机器人的外观时相互交织,从而产生老年人的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信