On “historical unity” of Russian and Ukrainian: A linguistic perspective on language conflict and change

Anyssa Murphy, Lex Whalen, Stanley Dubinsky, M. Gavin, J. Bailyn, Jackson Ginn
{"title":"On “historical unity” of Russian and Ukrainian: A linguistic perspective on language conflict and change","authors":"Anyssa Murphy, Lex Whalen, Stanley Dubinsky, M. Gavin, J. Bailyn, Jackson Ginn","doi":"10.3765/plsa.v8i1.5467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on Putin’s (2021) misguided claim regarding “historical [linguistic] unity” of Russian and Ukrainian. Their being two distinct languages is not in question, as opposed (for example) to Serbian and Croatian. However, it is important to substantiate the objective reality of those differences, taking a strong stand against unjustified claims about linguistic [unity] where there are no grounds for them. Implementing a Python-coded algorithm, like those described in Nerbonne & Kretzschmar 2013, we calculate Levenshtein distance between frequency-based word lists, in a manner sensitive to both organic and contact-induced change, to fully reveal Ukrainian’s complex relationship with both Russian and Polish.","PeriodicalId":299752,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America","volume":"20 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v8i1.5467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focuses on Putin’s (2021) misguided claim regarding “historical [linguistic] unity” of Russian and Ukrainian. Their being two distinct languages is not in question, as opposed (for example) to Serbian and Croatian. However, it is important to substantiate the objective reality of those differences, taking a strong stand against unjustified claims about linguistic [unity] where there are no grounds for them. Implementing a Python-coded algorithm, like those described in Nerbonne & Kretzschmar 2013, we calculate Levenshtein distance between frequency-based word lists, in a manner sensitive to both organic and contact-induced change, to fully reveal Ukrainian’s complex relationship with both Russian and Polish.
论俄语与乌克兰语的“历史统一性”:语言冲突与变迁的语言学视角
本文重点关注普京(2021年)关于俄罗斯和乌克兰“历史[语言]统一”的误导性主张。他们是两种不同的语言,这是没有问题的,例如,与塞尔维亚语和克罗地亚语相反。然而,重要的是要证实这些差异的客观现实,对没有根据的关于语言[统一]的不合理主张采取强硬立场。实现python编码的算法,就像Nerbonne & Kretzschmar 2013中描述的那样,我们以一种对有机和接触引起的变化敏感的方式计算基于频率的单词列表之间的Levenshtein距离,以充分揭示乌克兰语与俄语和波兰语的复杂关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信