Institutional Challenges and Political Costs in the US Failure to Ratify the ICESCR

Emmanuel Hamidi
{"title":"Institutional Challenges and Political Costs in the US Failure to Ratify the ICESCR","authors":"Emmanuel Hamidi","doi":"10.5070/B3341048896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Hamidi, Emmanuel | Abstract: On the international stage, the United States has played an active political role in the drafting process of international human rights treaties that shape both how human rights are framed and enforced. However, the United States has politically struggled to implement these international human rights treaties on a domestic level. Particularly, the United States government has carried structural and political tension preventing its embrace of the ICESCR. The following analysis will draw upon existing literature of the US relationship with the ICESCR and utilize Beth Simmon’s theory of treaty implementation as a framework to explain why the US has failed to ratify this central international human rights treaty. The investigation will find, by accounting for institutional hurdle, cultural preferences, and political will, that the politicization of economic rights in the US leads to favoring obstruction and isolationism in terms of treaty implementation, particularly when these deal with positive, economic rights.","PeriodicalId":243071,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Undergraduate Journal","volume":"2018 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Undergraduate Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/B3341048896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Author(s): Hamidi, Emmanuel | Abstract: On the international stage, the United States has played an active political role in the drafting process of international human rights treaties that shape both how human rights are framed and enforced. However, the United States has politically struggled to implement these international human rights treaties on a domestic level. Particularly, the United States government has carried structural and political tension preventing its embrace of the ICESCR. The following analysis will draw upon existing literature of the US relationship with the ICESCR and utilize Beth Simmon’s theory of treaty implementation as a framework to explain why the US has failed to ratify this central international human rights treaty. The investigation will find, by accounting for institutional hurdle, cultural preferences, and political will, that the politicization of economic rights in the US leads to favoring obstruction and isolationism in terms of treaty implementation, particularly when these deal with positive, economic rights.
美国未能批准《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》的制度挑战和政治代价
摘要:在国际舞台上,美国在国际人权条约的起草过程中发挥了积极的政治作用,影响了人权的框架和实施。然而,美国在政治上一直在努力在国内执行这些国际人权条约。特别是,美国政府的结构性和政治紧张局势阻碍了它接受《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》。下面的分析将借鉴美国与ICESCR关系的现有文献,并利用Beth simon的条约执行理论作为框架来解释为什么美国未能批准这一核心的国际人权条约。调查将发现,考虑到制度障碍、文化偏好和政治意愿,美国经济权利的政治化导致在条约实施方面倾向于阻碍和孤立主义,尤其是在涉及积极的经济权利时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信