Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Method on Text-based Case in Twitter

P. Telnoni, Reza Budiawan, Mutia Qana’a
{"title":"Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Method on Text-based Case in Twitter","authors":"P. Telnoni, Reza Budiawan, Mutia Qana’a","doi":"10.1109/ICISS48059.2019.8969850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) gaining momentum on industry and academic field, a deeper understanding for AI and ML are highly required. One of the most popular sub-field in this field is text analysis. This paper will discuss the performance of classification methods for text-based data and give the best choices of classification method in term of accuracy and training time, so that will help ML enthusiast to build ML project that does not require high computational cost. This paper aimed to give recommendation to practitioner and academic about which classifier best for text classification. This paper will limit its study in supervised learning only. The tested algorithm will be Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, and K-Nearest Neighbor. To simplify the project, text will be labelled into single-label data, not multi-label. The test shows that SVM gives best result, in term of accuracy and training time among other methods.","PeriodicalId":125643,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS48059.2019.8969850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) gaining momentum on industry and academic field, a deeper understanding for AI and ML are highly required. One of the most popular sub-field in this field is text analysis. This paper will discuss the performance of classification methods for text-based data and give the best choices of classification method in term of accuracy and training time, so that will help ML enthusiast to build ML project that does not require high computational cost. This paper aimed to give recommendation to practitioner and academic about which classifier best for text classification. This paper will limit its study in supervised learning only. The tested algorithm will be Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, and K-Nearest Neighbor. To simplify the project, text will be labelled into single-label data, not multi-label. The test shows that SVM gives best result, in term of accuracy and training time among other methods.
推特文本案例的机器学习分类方法比较
随着人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)在工业界和学术界的蓬勃发展,人们迫切需要对AI和ML有更深入的了解。该领域最受欢迎的子领域之一是文本分析。本文将讨论基于文本数据的分类方法的性能,并在准确率和训练时间方面给出分类方法的最佳选择,从而帮助ML爱好者构建不需要高计算成本的ML项目。本文旨在为从业者和学者推荐最适合文本分类的分类器。本文的研究仅限于监督学习。测试的算法将是支持向量机,逻辑回归,朴素贝叶斯,随机森林和k近邻。为了简化项目,文本将被标记为单标签数据,而不是多标签。实验结果表明,SVM在准确率和训练时间上都是其他方法中效果最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信