Deviation of Ethics in Politics and the State

A. Džafić, Amar Kozadra
{"title":"Deviation of Ethics in Politics and the State","authors":"A. Džafić, Amar Kozadra","doi":"10.53028/1986-6127.2022.13.1.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The connection of mind and conscience (morality) gives rise to the highest degree of consciousness. Awareness is expressed as the ability to plan actions and anticipate their consequences. The common oundation of ethics and politics in ancient Greece is the idea of justice as the highest virtue in the actions of individuals. Citizens were expected to be both moral and capable of participating in politics. While ethics considers the actions of man as an individual, politics refers to mental action in a political community of free and equal citizens. Later, the distance between ethics and politics made it impossible for justice to be the sole goal of action. Morality is reduced to the inner voice of conscience, and politics to art. Modern man seeks benefit on the outside himself, and on the inside himself he can seek conscience or forget about it. The connection between ethics and politics comes to life through the concept of responsibility. The new approach is of the opinion that ethics can no longer be limited to the moral duties of the individual. Ethics must be oriented to humanity, the future, but also beyond that: to nature, the unborn, etc. Considering morality in the context of society, following the example of ancient times, opens the way for ethical thinking in politics and the state.","PeriodicalId":296646,"journal":{"name":"Uprava","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uprava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53028/1986-6127.2022.13.1.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The connection of mind and conscience (morality) gives rise to the highest degree of consciousness. Awareness is expressed as the ability to plan actions and anticipate their consequences. The common oundation of ethics and politics in ancient Greece is the idea of justice as the highest virtue in the actions of individuals. Citizens were expected to be both moral and capable of participating in politics. While ethics considers the actions of man as an individual, politics refers to mental action in a political community of free and equal citizens. Later, the distance between ethics and politics made it impossible for justice to be the sole goal of action. Morality is reduced to the inner voice of conscience, and politics to art. Modern man seeks benefit on the outside himself, and on the inside himself he can seek conscience or forget about it. The connection between ethics and politics comes to life through the concept of responsibility. The new approach is of the opinion that ethics can no longer be limited to the moral duties of the individual. Ethics must be oriented to humanity, the future, but also beyond that: to nature, the unborn, etc. Considering morality in the context of society, following the example of ancient times, opens the way for ethical thinking in politics and the state.
政治与国家的伦理偏差
心灵和良心(道德)的联系产生了最高程度的意识。意识表现为计划行动和预测其后果的能力。古希腊伦理和政治的共同基础是将正义视为个人行为中的最高美德。人们期望公民既要有道德,又要有能力参与政治。伦理考虑的是人作为个体的行为,而政治是指自由平等的公民在政治共同体中的心理行为。后来,伦理与政治之间的距离使得正义不可能成为行动的唯一目标。道德沦为良心的内心声音,政治沦为艺术。现代人追求的是自身外在的利益,而在自身内在,他可以追求良心,也可以忘却良知。伦理和政治之间的联系是通过责任的概念来实现的。新方法的观点是,伦理不能再局限于个人的道德义务。伦理必须面向人类、面向未来,但也要超越这些:面向自然、面向未出生的人等等。以古代为例,在社会背景下思考道德,为政治和国家的伦理思考开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信