{"title":"Heidegger’s thanatology","authors":"Milan Brdar","doi":"10.2298/theo1904099b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article was writen to eleborate three teses: First, we have paradox that\n Heidegger obtained the instant glory with publishing of Being and Time\n (1927): But in due time it was impossible to understand this book as for its\n main tenets. It remained untransparent if intepreteur is not ackowledged\n with Heideggers papers writen from 1922. until 1929. Second thesis: full\n understanding of Heidegger?s work in any of its parts asks for the look from\n witihin the whole of its opus beforhand. Closely conected with it one must\n have in mind Heidegger?s famous turn (Wendung) and its consequences for his\n pihosophy of the second phase. Third: important issue of Heideggers work as\n a trial for all Heidegger-interpretation is the sense of authenticity in\n vast number of interpretation. It is a real philosophocal scandal, first,\n for we have failed insurching for interpretation of sense oh human existance\n than not lose a connection with Heideggers main theme: surching for the\n sense of Being; second, we did not find the interpretation founded in\n positive valuation of being towards death as ?most authentic? form for\n Dasein. Closely related to this there is not article that demonstrates sense\n and significance of relation to death for realization of program of sense of\n being. Therefore, in the face of such a scandalous condition in the realim\n of Heidegger intgerpretation, author elaborates the sense of ?the relation\n toward death? on two ways: first, within the Beong of Time, and second, in\n the wider context from 1922. until 1929. Formula tha is ?most authentic? for\n everyday man litteraly could be not understandble within Being and Time, as\n relevent on the meta-level of philosophical surching for the sense of being.\n Its understanding become attainable by the aid of the lecture ?What is\n Metaphysics? (1929). Also, full understanding in its methodological meaning\n unfolds not on the level of everydayness but on the meta-level of\n philosophy, and asks for full understanding of the reasons for the turn\n (Wendung) as a prior and necessary condition that its starting point have\n had in the very same lecture. At the end of the article author point out\n that the ultimate aim of whole Heideggers work on the deconstruction of\n nto-theological tradition of metaphysics to attain truthfull authenticity\n through the juncture the man and Being in the Event (Ereignis).","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo1904099b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article was writen to eleborate three teses: First, we have paradox that
Heidegger obtained the instant glory with publishing of Being and Time
(1927): But in due time it was impossible to understand this book as for its
main tenets. It remained untransparent if intepreteur is not ackowledged
with Heideggers papers writen from 1922. until 1929. Second thesis: full
understanding of Heidegger?s work in any of its parts asks for the look from
witihin the whole of its opus beforhand. Closely conected with it one must
have in mind Heidegger?s famous turn (Wendung) and its consequences for his
pihosophy of the second phase. Third: important issue of Heideggers work as
a trial for all Heidegger-interpretation is the sense of authenticity in
vast number of interpretation. It is a real philosophocal scandal, first,
for we have failed insurching for interpretation of sense oh human existance
than not lose a connection with Heideggers main theme: surching for the
sense of Being; second, we did not find the interpretation founded in
positive valuation of being towards death as ?most authentic? form for
Dasein. Closely related to this there is not article that demonstrates sense
and significance of relation to death for realization of program of sense of
being. Therefore, in the face of such a scandalous condition in the realim
of Heidegger intgerpretation, author elaborates the sense of ?the relation
toward death? on two ways: first, within the Beong of Time, and second, in
the wider context from 1922. until 1929. Formula tha is ?most authentic? for
everyday man litteraly could be not understandble within Being and Time, as
relevent on the meta-level of philosophical surching for the sense of being.
Its understanding become attainable by the aid of the lecture ?What is
Metaphysics? (1929). Also, full understanding in its methodological meaning
unfolds not on the level of everydayness but on the meta-level of
philosophy, and asks for full understanding of the reasons for the turn
(Wendung) as a prior and necessary condition that its starting point have
had in the very same lecture. At the end of the article author point out
that the ultimate aim of whole Heideggers work on the deconstruction of
nto-theological tradition of metaphysics to attain truthfull authenticity
through the juncture the man and Being in the Event (Ereignis).