An Innovative and Independent Method for Formation Strengths and Facies Identification Using Real-Time Downhole Drilling Data, and its Application in Geosteering for Optimal Well Placement

U. Prasad, F. Jonsbråten, D. Holbrough, C. Saint
{"title":"An Innovative and Independent Method for Formation Strengths and Facies Identification Using Real-Time Downhole Drilling Data, and its Application in Geosteering for Optimal Well Placement","authors":"U. Prasad, F. Jonsbråten, D. Holbrough, C. Saint","doi":"10.2118/213633-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Understanding of rock strength, and its variability along the length of the well, is essential for building an efficient well trajectory during geosteering operations. Traditionally, drill cuttings, surface gas analysis, measurements while drilling (MWD) data and Logging While Drilling (LWD) measurements have been used to optimize trajectories. Rock mechanical properties, derived from petrophysical well logs are key to drilling, production and recovery potential of the well: However, in a vast majority of geosteered wells, LWD data and the derived rock properties are not available thus conforming to the given well trajectory and successful Geosteering is difficult. In comparison, real-time downhole drilling data is usually available but rarely used. An innovative, reliable and robust method is presented which capitalizes on downhole MWD and LWD data.\n This method uses downhole weight-on-bit (WOB), rotational speed (RPM), downhole torque (TOR), and rate-of-penetration (ROP), to characterize the mechanical specific energy (MSE) consumed in the drilling process. The specific bit diameter (D), mud-weight (MW) and depth (TVD) of drilling are also used in the model. If the task is to optimize drilling parameters for a new formation (e.g. drill-off-test), then \"minimum\" MSE is captured. However, if the task is continuous drilling, geosteering, and creating a stable well for its subsequent stage and cluster-wise hydraulic fracture design, then \"instantaneous\" MSE is used to infer strength of the rocks and their variation along the length of the well.\n An offshore well from the North Sea was initially selected to apply the concept of the above technology on several post well data analyses using downhole drilling data together with average ROP and RPM. Further, the same concept was used in a real-time application with downhole drilling data. The gamma-ray, neutron porosity, density and resistivity were analyzed and compared with the MSE obtained. Drilling efficiency was assumed based on prescribed industry standards for calculating confined compressive strength (CCS), Internal Friction Angle (IFA), and unconfined compressive strength (UCS). The UCS estimated at a scale of 1.0-1.5″ scale versus depth-of-cut (scale of 0.1-0.5″) resolution matched well with log based UCS from density, porosity and acoustic logs. Calculated results are compared with lab-based core test data where available. The details of these calculations and successful application to Geosteering are presented.\n These strength estimates are of benefit to directional drilling engineers for safe and economic well placement along optimum well trajectory, better well production and economic recovery from successive multi-stage and stage-and-cluster hydraulic fracturing designs. An ‘Efficiency’ Factor’ used in the process is discussed which originates from strengthening of rocks due to friction, chip-hold-down effect on cuttings, strengthening due to dilatancy, and cuttings-extrusion like behavior prevalent in drilling.","PeriodicalId":249245,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/213633-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding of rock strength, and its variability along the length of the well, is essential for building an efficient well trajectory during geosteering operations. Traditionally, drill cuttings, surface gas analysis, measurements while drilling (MWD) data and Logging While Drilling (LWD) measurements have been used to optimize trajectories. Rock mechanical properties, derived from petrophysical well logs are key to drilling, production and recovery potential of the well: However, in a vast majority of geosteered wells, LWD data and the derived rock properties are not available thus conforming to the given well trajectory and successful Geosteering is difficult. In comparison, real-time downhole drilling data is usually available but rarely used. An innovative, reliable and robust method is presented which capitalizes on downhole MWD and LWD data. This method uses downhole weight-on-bit (WOB), rotational speed (RPM), downhole torque (TOR), and rate-of-penetration (ROP), to characterize the mechanical specific energy (MSE) consumed in the drilling process. The specific bit diameter (D), mud-weight (MW) and depth (TVD) of drilling are also used in the model. If the task is to optimize drilling parameters for a new formation (e.g. drill-off-test), then "minimum" MSE is captured. However, if the task is continuous drilling, geosteering, and creating a stable well for its subsequent stage and cluster-wise hydraulic fracture design, then "instantaneous" MSE is used to infer strength of the rocks and their variation along the length of the well. An offshore well from the North Sea was initially selected to apply the concept of the above technology on several post well data analyses using downhole drilling data together with average ROP and RPM. Further, the same concept was used in a real-time application with downhole drilling data. The gamma-ray, neutron porosity, density and resistivity were analyzed and compared with the MSE obtained. Drilling efficiency was assumed based on prescribed industry standards for calculating confined compressive strength (CCS), Internal Friction Angle (IFA), and unconfined compressive strength (UCS). The UCS estimated at a scale of 1.0-1.5″ scale versus depth-of-cut (scale of 0.1-0.5″) resolution matched well with log based UCS from density, porosity and acoustic logs. Calculated results are compared with lab-based core test data where available. The details of these calculations and successful application to Geosteering are presented. These strength estimates are of benefit to directional drilling engineers for safe and economic well placement along optimum well trajectory, better well production and economic recovery from successive multi-stage and stage-and-cluster hydraulic fracturing designs. An ‘Efficiency’ Factor’ used in the process is discussed which originates from strengthening of rocks due to friction, chip-hold-down effect on cuttings, strengthening due to dilatancy, and cuttings-extrusion like behavior prevalent in drilling.
一种利用实时井下钻井数据进行地层强度和相识别的创新独立方法及其在地质导向中的应用
了解岩石强度及其沿井长变化,对于在地质导向作业中建立有效的井眼轨迹至关重要。传统上,钻井岩屑、地面气体分析、随钻测量(MWD)数据和随钻测井(LWD)数据被用于优化轨迹。岩石物理测井数据得出的岩石力学性质是决定井的钻井、生产和采收率的关键。然而,在绝大多数地质导向井中,由于无法获得随钻测井数据和导出的岩石性质,因此很难符合给定的井眼轨迹,因此很难成功实现地质导向。相比之下,通常可以获得实时井下钻井数据,但很少使用。利用井下随钻测井和随钻测井数据,提出了一种新颖、可靠、鲁棒的方法。该方法使用井下钻压(WOB)、转速(RPM)、井下扭矩(TOR)和钻速(ROP)来表征钻井过程中消耗的机械比能(MSE)。模型中还使用了特定钻头直径(D)、泥浆密度(MW)和钻井深度(TVD)。如果任务是优化新地层的钻井参数(例如钻脱测试),则捕获“最小”MSE。然而,如果任务是连续钻井,地质导向,并为后续阶段和集群水力压裂设计创造稳定的井,那么“瞬时”MSE用于推断岩石的强度及其沿井长的变化。最初选择了北海的一口海上油井,利用井下钻井数据以及平均ROP和RPM,将上述技术的概念应用于几口井后数据分析。此外,在井下钻井数据的实时应用中也使用了相同的概念。分析了伽玛射线、中子孔隙度、密度和电阻率,并与MSE进行了比较。钻井效率是根据规定的行业标准来计算承压抗压强度(CCS)、内摩擦角(IFA)和无侧限抗压强度(UCS)。与切割深度(0.1-0.5″)分辨率相比,在1.0-1.5″尺度下估计的UCS与基于密度、孔隙度和声波测井的UCS相匹配。计算结果与实验室岩心测试数据进行了比较。介绍了这些计算的细节和在地质导向中的成功应用。这些强度估计有助于定向钻井工程师沿着最佳井眼轨迹进行安全、经济的井眼布置,提高连续多级和分段集束水力压裂设计的产量和经济采收率。讨论了过程中使用的“效率”因子,该因子源于摩擦引起的岩石强化、岩屑对岩屑的压紧效应、膨胀引起的强化以及钻井中普遍存在的岩屑挤压行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信