Conclusion

E. Mahoney
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"E. Mahoney","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198818625.003.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This concluding chapter addresses the significance of examining the legal history record to better understand the nature, influences, and values of contemporary institutions. It is important to know, for example, why the modern law on the interception of communications contains the unique and eccentric power of the Home Secretary rather than a judge to issue warrants to authorize the opening of mail and the tapping of phones. The historical record also more clearly casts light on the close relationship between the Security Service and the government, which by virtue of this procedure not only knows about but also authorizes MI5 targets and operations, raising doubts about the operational independence of MI5. Moreover, the experience of the past helps in assessing problems of the present. In particular, it gives credibility and continuity to complaints about the use and abuse of surveillance powers and the corruption of the criminal justice system for political ends.","PeriodicalId":235253,"journal":{"name":"MI5, the Cold War, and the Rule of Law","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MI5, the Cold War, and the Rule of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198818625.003.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This concluding chapter addresses the significance of examining the legal history record to better understand the nature, influences, and values of contemporary institutions. It is important to know, for example, why the modern law on the interception of communications contains the unique and eccentric power of the Home Secretary rather than a judge to issue warrants to authorize the opening of mail and the tapping of phones. The historical record also more clearly casts light on the close relationship between the Security Service and the government, which by virtue of this procedure not only knows about but also authorizes MI5 targets and operations, raising doubts about the operational independence of MI5. Moreover, the experience of the past helps in assessing problems of the present. In particular, it gives credibility and continuity to complaints about the use and abuse of surveillance powers and the corruption of the criminal justice system for political ends.
结论
最后一章论述了研究法律历史记录的重要性,以更好地理解当代制度的性质、影响和价值。例如,重要的是要知道,为什么关于窃听通信的现代法律包含了内政大臣而不是法官的独特和古怪的权力,即签发搜查令来授权打开邮件和窃听电话。历史记录也更清楚地揭示了军情五处与政府之间的密切关系,通过这一程序,政府不仅知道并授权军情五处的目标和行动,这让人们对军情五处的运作独立性产生了怀疑。此外,过去的经验有助于评估目前的问题。特别是,它使关于使用和滥用监视权力以及为政治目的而腐化刑事司法制度的控诉具有可信性和连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信