PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT FACILITATOR AND EXPLAINING (SFE) DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL PADA MATERI TRIGONOMETRI

Stela Ruhulessin, T. G. Ratumanan, H. Tamalene
{"title":"PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT FACILITATOR AND EXPLAINING (SFE) DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL PADA MATERI TRIGONOMETRI","authors":"Stela Ruhulessin, T. G. Ratumanan, H. Tamalene","doi":"10.30598/JUPITEKVOL2ISS1PP1-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes of class X students of SMA 12 Ambon using cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) and conventional learning models on trigonometric material. The type of research is experimental research (Experimental Research) with the Post-Test Only Control Group Design. The analysis technique is descriptive statistical analysis and inferential test statistics consisting of normality test data, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. The data are processed using SPSS version 20.0. The results of this study are (1) there are differences in learning outcomes using the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining and conventional learning models, which shows that the value of  t_hitung  3.1128 is greater than the value of t_tabel  2.0003 and the value of Sig. (2-tailed) smaller than the value of alpha 0.05 which is 0.002; (2) learning outcomes of students who use the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining type are better when compared to those using conventional learning models","PeriodicalId":367306,"journal":{"name":"JUPITEK: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JUPITEK: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30598/JUPITEKVOL2ISS1PP1-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes of class X students of SMA 12 Ambon using cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) and conventional learning models on trigonometric material. The type of research is experimental research (Experimental Research) with the Post-Test Only Control Group Design. The analysis technique is descriptive statistical analysis and inferential test statistics consisting of normality test data, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. The data are processed using SPSS version 20.0. The results of this study are (1) there are differences in learning outcomes using the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining and conventional learning models, which shows that the value of  t_hitung  3.1128 is greater than the value of t_tabel  2.0003 and the value of Sig. (2-tailed) smaller than the value of alpha 0.05 which is 0.002; (2) learning outcomes of students who use the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining type are better when compared to those using conventional learning models
高中X班学生学习成绩的不同之处,使用合作学生类型的学生范式和三角材料的传统学习模式
本研究旨在探讨SMA 12 Ambon的X班学生在三角材料的合作学习模式(Student Facilitator and explanation, SFE)和传统学习模式下的学习效果是否存在差异。研究类型为实验研究(experimental research),仅采用测试后控制组设计。分析方法是描述性统计分析和推论检验统计,包括正态性检验、齐性检验和假设检验。数据采用SPSS 20.0版本进行处理。本研究结果表明:(1)合作学习模式“学生辅助与解释”与传统学习模式的学习结果存在差异,t_table 3.1128的值大于t_table 2.0003的值,Sig. (2-tailed)的值小于alpha 0.05的值(0.002);(2)使用合作学习模式的学生学习效果优于使用传统学习模式的学生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信