Analisa Perbandingan Pengendali PID pada Motor DC Menggunakan Metode Ziegler-Nichols dan Trial and Error

Refigol Afrawira, Rendi Fajar Gumilang, Sitti Amalia, Sepanur Bandri
{"title":"Analisa Perbandingan Pengendali PID pada Motor DC Menggunakan Metode Ziegler-Nichols dan Trial and Error","authors":"Refigol Afrawira, Rendi Fajar Gumilang, Sitti Amalia, Sepanur Bandri","doi":"10.38035/rrj.v5i3.758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to design a PID control on a DC motor using 2 tuning methods, namely Trial & Error and Ziegler-Nichols. The results showed that the Pittman DC Motor system response from the Pittman DC motor was very unstable, in which there were still many oscillations and a very high overshoot value. In the Trial & Error method, the system response value was obtained on the P controller, namely, rise time = 0.000551 s, settling time = 0.00468 s, overshoot = 37.1 %, peak time = 0.972 s, and time delay = 0.00134 s. on the PI controller namely, rise time = 0.000396 s, settling time = 0.00534 s, overshoot = 47.7%, peak time = 1.23 s, and time delay = 0.00102 s. on the PID controller namely, rise time = 0.000223 s, settling time = 0.00502 s, overshoot = 64.6%, peak time = 1.54 s, and time delay = 0.000601 s. In the Ziegler-NIchols method, the response value of the system to the P controller is obtained, namely, rise time = 0.00118 s, settling time = 0.00564 s, overshoot = 15.4%, peak time = 0.178 s, and time delay = 0.00262 s. on the PI controller namely, rise time = 0.000275 s, settling time = 0.00531 s, overshoot = 58.3%, peak time = 1.44 s, and time delay = 0.000767 s. on the PID controller, namely, rise time = 0.00133 s, settling time = 0.00446 s, overshoot = 12.6 %, peak time = 0.0237 s, and time delay = 0.00288 s. The simulation results show that the value for the Ziegler-Nichols tuning method is better than the Trial & Error method, perhaps because the input value for the Trial & Error method is larger.","PeriodicalId":333433,"journal":{"name":"Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v5i3.758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to design a PID control on a DC motor using 2 tuning methods, namely Trial & Error and Ziegler-Nichols. The results showed that the Pittman DC Motor system response from the Pittman DC motor was very unstable, in which there were still many oscillations and a very high overshoot value. In the Trial & Error method, the system response value was obtained on the P controller, namely, rise time = 0.000551 s, settling time = 0.00468 s, overshoot = 37.1 %, peak time = 0.972 s, and time delay = 0.00134 s. on the PI controller namely, rise time = 0.000396 s, settling time = 0.00534 s, overshoot = 47.7%, peak time = 1.23 s, and time delay = 0.00102 s. on the PID controller namely, rise time = 0.000223 s, settling time = 0.00502 s, overshoot = 64.6%, peak time = 1.54 s, and time delay = 0.000601 s. In the Ziegler-NIchols method, the response value of the system to the P controller is obtained, namely, rise time = 0.00118 s, settling time = 0.00564 s, overshoot = 15.4%, peak time = 0.178 s, and time delay = 0.00262 s. on the PI controller namely, rise time = 0.000275 s, settling time = 0.00531 s, overshoot = 58.3%, peak time = 1.44 s, and time delay = 0.000767 s. on the PID controller, namely, rise time = 0.00133 s, settling time = 0.00446 s, overshoot = 12.6 %, peak time = 0.0237 s, and time delay = 0.00288 s. The simulation results show that the value for the Ziegler-Nichols tuning method is better than the Trial & Error method, perhaps because the input value for the Trial & Error method is larger.
ananalisa Perbandingan Pengendali PID马达直流电动机Menggunakan方法Ziegler-Nichols dan试验与错误
本研究的目的是采用Trial & Error和Ziegler-Nichols两种整定方法对直流电机进行PID控制设计。结果表明,皮特曼直流电动机对皮特曼直流电动机系统的响应非常不稳定,其中仍然存在许多振荡和很高的超调值。试验和错误的方法,得到系统响应值P控制器,即上升时间= 0.000551 s,沉淀时间= 0.00468年代,过度= 37.1%,高峰时间= 0.972 s,和时间延迟= 0.00134 s PI控制器即上升时间= 0.000396 s,沉淀时间= 0.00534年代,过度= 47.7%,高峰时间= 1.23 s,和时间延迟= 0.00102 s . PID控制器即上升时间= 0.000223 s,沉淀时间= 0.00502年代,过度= 64.6%,高峰时间= 1.54,延时= 0.000601 s。在Ziegler-NIchols方法中,系统的响应值P控制器,即上升时间= 0.00118 s,沉淀时间= 0.00564年代,过度= 15.4%,高峰时间= 0.178 s,和时间延迟= 0.00262 s PI控制器即上升时间= 0.000275 s,沉淀时间= 0.00531年代,过度= 58.3%,高峰时间= 1.44 s,和时间延迟= 0.000767 s . PID控制器,即上升时间= 0.00133年代,沉淀时间= 0.00446年代,过度= 12.6%,高峰时间= 0.0237,延时= 0.00288 s。仿真结果表明,Ziegler-Nichols调谐法的值比Trial & Error调谐法的值更好,这可能是因为Trial & Error调谐法的输入值更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信