FROM THE CHRIST-KILLER TO THE LUCIFERIAN: THE MYTHOLOGIZED JEW AND FREEMASON IN LATE NINETEENTH- AND EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY ENGLISH CATHOLIC DISCOURSE
{"title":"FROM THE CHRIST-KILLER TO THE LUCIFERIAN: THE MYTHOLOGIZED JEW AND FREEMASON IN LATE NINETEENTH- AND EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY ENGLISH CATHOLIC DISCOURSE","authors":"S. Mayers","doi":"10.31826/MJJ-2013-080103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional wisdom in studies of English antisemitism has tended to suggest that by the nineteenth century religious prejudice had largely been secularised or replaced by modern socio- political and racial forms of hostility. This may have been the case in the general English discourse, but in the English Catholic discourse at the turn of the twentieth century, traditional pre-modern myths, with their cast of Jewish and Masonic diabolists, were still a pervasive feature. This article examines a range of sources, including the published works of prominent and obscure authors, the pastoral letters and sermons of cardinals, bishops and priests, articles and editorials in newspapers and periodicals, letters, and a small number of oral testimonies, in order to bring to light an English Catholic discourse which, with the exception of the published works of Hilaire Belloc and G. K. Chesterton, has largely gone unexamined. Prominent mythological villains in the English Catholic discourse during the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century included \"the Pharisee,\" \"the Christ-Killer,\" \"the Ritual Murderer,\" \"the Sorcerer,\" \"the Antichrist\" and \"the Luciferian.\" This article examines the continued presence of narratives in which Jews and Freemasons were assigned one or more of these villainous roles. This article presents some of the results of an investigation into the representations of \"the Jew\" which existed in English Catholic discourse during the final years of the nineteenth century and the early decades of the twentieth century (circa 1896 to 1929). Three main types of representation were considered during the investigation: the roles assigned to the Jew in traditional Christian myths, contemporary stereotypes of the Jew and composite constructions which combine themes drawn from myths and stereotypes. 1 For the purpose of the investigation, stereotypes were broadly speaking defined as crude, powerful, resilient but protean representations, which take so-called human vices and virtues, often distorted and magnified, and project them onto all individuals within the stereotyped group. In the English Catholic discourse, the stereotyped Jew was greedy, cowardly, unpatriotic and secretive. 2 He was also depicted as smart, but his intelligence was not considered a virtue. 3 Myths were in essence defined in the investigation as important and persistent stories","PeriodicalId":305040,"journal":{"name":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31826/MJJ-2013-080103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Conventional wisdom in studies of English antisemitism has tended to suggest that by the nineteenth century religious prejudice had largely been secularised or replaced by modern socio- political and racial forms of hostility. This may have been the case in the general English discourse, but in the English Catholic discourse at the turn of the twentieth century, traditional pre-modern myths, with their cast of Jewish and Masonic diabolists, were still a pervasive feature. This article examines a range of sources, including the published works of prominent and obscure authors, the pastoral letters and sermons of cardinals, bishops and priests, articles and editorials in newspapers and periodicals, letters, and a small number of oral testimonies, in order to bring to light an English Catholic discourse which, with the exception of the published works of Hilaire Belloc and G. K. Chesterton, has largely gone unexamined. Prominent mythological villains in the English Catholic discourse during the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century included "the Pharisee," "the Christ-Killer," "the Ritual Murderer," "the Sorcerer," "the Antichrist" and "the Luciferian." This article examines the continued presence of narratives in which Jews and Freemasons were assigned one or more of these villainous roles. This article presents some of the results of an investigation into the representations of "the Jew" which existed in English Catholic discourse during the final years of the nineteenth century and the early decades of the twentieth century (circa 1896 to 1929). Three main types of representation were considered during the investigation: the roles assigned to the Jew in traditional Christian myths, contemporary stereotypes of the Jew and composite constructions which combine themes drawn from myths and stereotypes. 1 For the purpose of the investigation, stereotypes were broadly speaking defined as crude, powerful, resilient but protean representations, which take so-called human vices and virtues, often distorted and magnified, and project them onto all individuals within the stereotyped group. In the English Catholic discourse, the stereotyped Jew was greedy, cowardly, unpatriotic and secretive. 2 He was also depicted as smart, but his intelligence was not considered a virtue. 3 Myths were in essence defined in the investigation as important and persistent stories
研究英国反犹主义的传统智慧倾向于认为,到19世纪,宗教偏见在很大程度上已经世俗化,或被现代社会政治和种族形式的敌意所取代。这可能是一般英语话语的情况,但在二十世纪之交的英国天主教话语中,传统的前现代神话,以及犹太人和共济会的恶魔,仍然是一个普遍的特征。本文考察了一系列的资料来源,包括著名和不知名作家的出版作品,红衣主教、主教和牧师的牧函和布道,报纸和期刊上的文章和社论,信件,以及少量的口头证词,以揭示英国天主教的话语,除了Hilaire Belloc和G. K. Chesterton的出版作品外,大部分都没有被研究过。在19世纪末和20世纪初的英国天主教话语中,突出的神话恶棍包括“法利赛人”、“基督杀手”、“仪式凶手”、“巫师”、“反基督者”和“路西法人”。本文考察了犹太人和共济会成员被分配一个或多个这些邪恶角色的持续存在的叙述。这篇文章提出了一些调查的结果,在十九世纪的最后几年和二十世纪的早期几十年(大约1896年至1929年)存在于英语天主教话语中的“犹太人”的代表。在调查期间考虑了三种主要的表现形式:犹太人在传统基督教神话中所扮演的角色,当代对犹太人的刻板印象,以及结合神话和刻板印象主题的复合结构。为了调查的目的,刻板印象被广泛地定义为粗糙的、强大的、有弹性的、多变的表现,它把所谓的人类的缺点和美德,经常被扭曲和放大,投射到刻板印象群体中的所有个人身上。在英国天主教的话语中,犹太人的刻板印象是贪婪、懦弱、不爱国和诡秘。他也被描绘成聪明,但他的聪明并不被认为是一种美德。在调查中,神话在本质上被定义为重要而持久的故事