From Failed Recovery to Mutation: Armenian Women and Community in Post-Genocide Turkey

Ohannes Kılıçdağı
{"title":"From Failed Recovery to Mutation: Armenian Women and Community in Post-Genocide Turkey","authors":"Ohannes Kılıçdağı","doi":"10.3138/DIASPORA.20.2.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholarly studies of the history of the Armenians of Turkey in the post-genocide period are quite rare. Research from within Turkey has been difficult for political and academic reasons. There has not been a free political atmosphere in Turkey that would permit or encourage the production and making public of such works. Writing about Armenians from a perspective other than the official one would and in some cases did bring about trouble for those who engaged in such work. Moreover, until very recently, not many researchers in the Turkish academy pos­ sessed the essential historiographic and linguistic skills to study the his­ tory of the Armenian community.1 As for the members of the Armenian community, again, until the last two decades or so, young Armenians avoided the study of Armenian history, indeed of the social science and humanities altogether, because miscalculations concerning what would be permitted could lead young scholars to serious trouble. Scholars, whether of Armenian origin or non-Armenian, who live and produce in Europe or the United States have not been interested in much of what happened to the community of Armenian survivors after the genocide. At least one reason for this negligence must be the thought that the genocide was the ultimate end of the Armenian com­ munity in its homeland. Considering how enormous the loss was, study­ ing and talking about what remained may not have seemed worthwhile. Moreover, talking about the ongoing existence of Armenians in Turkey might have brought about the questioning of the genocide and its char­ acteristic of being a “final solution.” Yet some Armenians survived, re­ mained in Turkey, and created a third way of being Armenian; they","PeriodicalId":119873,"journal":{"name":"Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/DIASPORA.20.2.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholarly studies of the history of the Armenians of Turkey in the post-genocide period are quite rare. Research from within Turkey has been difficult for political and academic reasons. There has not been a free political atmosphere in Turkey that would permit or encourage the production and making public of such works. Writing about Armenians from a perspective other than the official one would and in some cases did bring about trouble for those who engaged in such work. Moreover, until very recently, not many researchers in the Turkish academy pos­ sessed the essential historiographic and linguistic skills to study the his­ tory of the Armenian community.1 As for the members of the Armenian community, again, until the last two decades or so, young Armenians avoided the study of Armenian history, indeed of the social science and humanities altogether, because miscalculations concerning what would be permitted could lead young scholars to serious trouble. Scholars, whether of Armenian origin or non-Armenian, who live and produce in Europe or the United States have not been interested in much of what happened to the community of Armenian survivors after the genocide. At least one reason for this negligence must be the thought that the genocide was the ultimate end of the Armenian com­ munity in its homeland. Considering how enormous the loss was, study­ ing and talking about what remained may not have seemed worthwhile. Moreover, talking about the ongoing existence of Armenians in Turkey might have brought about the questioning of the genocide and its char­ acteristic of being a “final solution.” Yet some Armenians survived, re­ mained in Turkey, and created a third way of being Armenian; they
从失败的恢复到突变:种族灭绝后土耳其的亚美尼亚妇女和社区
关于种族灭绝后时期土耳其亚美尼亚人历史的学术研究相当罕见。由于政治和学术原因,在土耳其国内进行研究一直很困难。土耳其没有一种允许或鼓励制作和公开这类作品的自由政治气氛。从官方以外的角度来写亚美尼亚人,有时确实会给从事这类工作的人带来麻烦。此外,直到最近,土耳其学术界没有多少研究人员具备必要的史学和语言学技能来研究亚美尼亚社区的历史至于亚美尼亚社区的成员,同样,直到最近二十年左右,年轻的亚美尼亚人都避免研究亚美尼亚历史,甚至是社会科学和人文科学,因为对允许的内容的错误估计可能会给年轻学者带来严重的麻烦。在欧洲或美国生活和生产的学者,无论是亚美尼亚人还是非亚美尼亚人,都对大屠杀后亚美尼亚幸存者群体的遭遇不太感兴趣。造成这种疏忽的至少一个原因,一定是认为种族灭绝是亚美尼亚社区在其家园的最终结局。考虑到损失的巨大,研究和讨论遗留下来的东西似乎不值得。此外,谈论亚美尼亚人在土耳其的持续存在可能会引发对种族灭绝及其“最终解决”特征的质疑。然而,一些亚美尼亚人幸存下来,留在了土耳其,并创造了作为亚美尼亚人的第三种方式;他们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信