How the Australian Ban on Short Selling During the GFC Affected Market Quality and Volatility

Thomas Henker, Julia Henker, Uwe Helmes
{"title":"How the Australian Ban on Short Selling During the GFC Affected Market Quality and Volatility","authors":"Thomas Henker, Julia Henker, Uwe Helmes","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1970711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the effects of the short selling ban, imposed by Australian regulators in the wake of the global financial crisis, on trading of financial stocks. Unlike other developed markets, where regulators imposed short-selling restrictions for brief periods of time at the height of the financial crisis, the ban on short selling of financial stocks on the Australian Stock Exchange lasted eight months, including both the tumultuous end of 2008 and the calmer period up to May 2009. Our control group consists of matched Canadian financial institutions which were unaffected by a short selling ban. We analyze the impact of the imposed short selling constraints on measures of market quality and on stock prices using univariate and multivariate fixed effects panel regressions. As predicted by previous theoretical work, we find that stocks subject to the short selling ban suffered a severe degradation in market quality. Controlling for the adverse effects of the financial crisis on financial markets, we show that imposing constraints on short-selling reduced trading activity, increased bid and ask spreads and increased intraday volatility. Moreover, there appears to be no evidence for lasting price support from the restrictions.","PeriodicalId":206472,"journal":{"name":"INTL: Political & Legal Issues (Topic)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTL: Political & Legal Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1970711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We examine the effects of the short selling ban, imposed by Australian regulators in the wake of the global financial crisis, on trading of financial stocks. Unlike other developed markets, where regulators imposed short-selling restrictions for brief periods of time at the height of the financial crisis, the ban on short selling of financial stocks on the Australian Stock Exchange lasted eight months, including both the tumultuous end of 2008 and the calmer period up to May 2009. Our control group consists of matched Canadian financial institutions which were unaffected by a short selling ban. We analyze the impact of the imposed short selling constraints on measures of market quality and on stock prices using univariate and multivariate fixed effects panel regressions. As predicted by previous theoretical work, we find that stocks subject to the short selling ban suffered a severe degradation in market quality. Controlling for the adverse effects of the financial crisis on financial markets, we show that imposing constraints on short-selling reduced trading activity, increased bid and ask spreads and increased intraday volatility. Moreover, there appears to be no evidence for lasting price support from the restrictions.
全球金融危机期间澳大利亚的卖空禁令如何影响市场质量和波动性
我们研究卖空禁令的影响,由澳大利亚监管机构在全球金融危机后实施,对金融股票的交易。与其它发达市场不同的是,在金融危机最严重的时候,监管机构会在短时间内实施卖空限制,而澳大利亚证券交易所(Australian Stock Exchange)对金融股的卖空禁令持续了8个月,包括2008年底的动荡时期和2009年5月之前较为平静的时期。我们的对照组由不受卖空禁令影响的匹配的加拿大金融机构组成。我们使用单变量和多变量固定效应面板回归分析了强加的卖空约束对市场质量度量和股票价格的影响。正如之前的理论工作所预测的那样,我们发现受卖空禁令影响的股票市场质量严重下降。控制金融危机对金融市场的不利影响,我们表明,对卖空施加限制减少了交易活动,增加了买卖价差,增加了日内波动性。此外,似乎没有证据表明限购措施会持续支撑价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信