Strategies for Construction of Majors in Universities with Different Characteristic Based on Social Needs

Xiuli Tan, Zhongquan Chen, Xin-Yang Liu, Peter Deeney, Zhisong Chen
{"title":"Strategies for Construction of Majors in Universities with Different Characteristic Based on Social Needs","authors":"Xiuli Tan, Zhongquan Chen, Xin-Yang Liu, Peter Deeney, Zhisong Chen","doi":"10.21078/JSSI-2019-474-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We used the basic principles of game theory to investigate development strategies for standards of professional competence in universities in the same geographic area, under conditions of non-uniform distribution of social demand preference. The results revealed that, under various conditions in our model, different approaches for differential strategies were selected by university U2 compared with university U1. Specifically, in the competition between U1 and U2, there is a differential strategy compression point of U2 to U1; When U2 universities choose the biggest differentiation strategy, university U1 also have differentiated strategy control points. Arbitrary decision-making of university U1 in relation to university U2 was based on the requirements of professional competence standards, according to the change of the social demand for professional competency standard, universities U2 will adopt the strategy of “no difference”, “maximum differentiation” and “comprehensive intermediate strategy”, respectively. The current results have theoretical implications for the selection of professional development and professional competence development strategies in asymmetric universities operating in the same geographic area.","PeriodicalId":258223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems Science and Information","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems Science and Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21078/JSSI-2019-474-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We used the basic principles of game theory to investigate development strategies for standards of professional competence in universities in the same geographic area, under conditions of non-uniform distribution of social demand preference. The results revealed that, under various conditions in our model, different approaches for differential strategies were selected by university U2 compared with university U1. Specifically, in the competition between U1 and U2, there is a differential strategy compression point of U2 to U1; When U2 universities choose the biggest differentiation strategy, university U1 also have differentiated strategy control points. Arbitrary decision-making of university U1 in relation to university U2 was based on the requirements of professional competence standards, according to the change of the social demand for professional competency standard, universities U2 will adopt the strategy of “no difference”, “maximum differentiation” and “comprehensive intermediate strategy”, respectively. The current results have theoretical implications for the selection of professional development and professional competence development strategies in asymmetric universities operating in the same geographic area.
基于社会需求的高校特色专业建设策略
摘要本文运用博弈论的基本原理,研究了在社会需求偏好不均匀分布条件下,同一地理区域内高校专业能力标准的发展策略。结果表明,在我们的模型中,在不同的条件下,U2大学与U1大学选择了不同的差异化策略方法。具体来说,在U1与U2的竞争中,存在U2对U1的差分策略压缩点;当U2大学选择最大差异化战略时,U1大学也有差异化战略控制点。大学U1对大学U2的任意决策是基于专业能力标准的要求,根据社会对专业能力标准需求的变化,大学U2将分别采取“无差异”策略、“最大差异化”策略和“综合中间策略”。研究结果对同一地理区域内非对称高校专业发展和专业能力发展战略的选择具有一定的理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信