Technology Acceptance and Readiness among different Generations of Urban Touists

M. Smith, Monica Coronel
{"title":"Technology Acceptance and Readiness among different Generations of Urban Touists","authors":"M. Smith, Monica Coronel","doi":"10.15170/mm.2023.57.01.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE AIMS OF THE PAPER\nSeveral motivators and inhibitors for technology acceptance and readiness have been identified, however, propensity to use digital tools can vary according to different factors, one of them being the users’ age. This study seeks to explore the technology acceptance and readiness of different generations of tourists in an urban destination.\nMETHODOLOGY\nThis qualitative study comprised 94 face-to-face interviews conducted during autumn 2019 and the spring of 2020 (before COVID-19) to foreign visitors from different age groups close to the main attractions in Budapest, Hungary. Interviews gathered visitors’ thoughts, experiences, and perceptions about tourism and technology. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and content analysed applying a deductive approach.\nMOST IMPORTANT RESULTS\nBaby Boomers are more inhibited than motivated in terms of technology readiness due to the lack of technical knowledge and challenges of use. Generation X are more optimistic about the usage of technologies driven by convenience and social influence. Younger generations use a wider range of digital tools while travelling due to greater levels of optimism and innovativeness. However, some participants from Generation Y1 and X consciously limit the use of technologies as they consider them disruptive. Findings also show that motivators tend to be more closely related to utilitarian rather than hedonic factors for all generations. Smartphones and Google Maps are the most used digital tools.\nThis novel study focuses on different models and approaches for technology acceptance and readiness from a generational perspective exploring the so-called ‘digital gap’. Furthermore, this study explores the correlation between different determinants of the proposed models. The context of an urban destination is also relatively novel, as many previous studies have focused rather on individual sites.\nRECOMMENDATIONS \nUrban destinations should facilitate conditions to encourage acceptance and readiness of technology among urban tourists. This not only includes digital infrastructure (e.g. WI-FI), but digital solutions and apps (e.g. tour guides in different languages) designed to attract different target markets (i.e. generations).","PeriodicalId":106701,"journal":{"name":"Marketing & Menedzsment","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing & Menedzsment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/mm.2023.57.01.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

THE AIMS OF THE PAPER Several motivators and inhibitors for technology acceptance and readiness have been identified, however, propensity to use digital tools can vary according to different factors, one of them being the users’ age. This study seeks to explore the technology acceptance and readiness of different generations of tourists in an urban destination. METHODOLOGY This qualitative study comprised 94 face-to-face interviews conducted during autumn 2019 and the spring of 2020 (before COVID-19) to foreign visitors from different age groups close to the main attractions in Budapest, Hungary. Interviews gathered visitors’ thoughts, experiences, and perceptions about tourism and technology. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and content analysed applying a deductive approach. MOST IMPORTANT RESULTS Baby Boomers are more inhibited than motivated in terms of technology readiness due to the lack of technical knowledge and challenges of use. Generation X are more optimistic about the usage of technologies driven by convenience and social influence. Younger generations use a wider range of digital tools while travelling due to greater levels of optimism and innovativeness. However, some participants from Generation Y1 and X consciously limit the use of technologies as they consider them disruptive. Findings also show that motivators tend to be more closely related to utilitarian rather than hedonic factors for all generations. Smartphones and Google Maps are the most used digital tools. This novel study focuses on different models and approaches for technology acceptance and readiness from a generational perspective exploring the so-called ‘digital gap’. Furthermore, this study explores the correlation between different determinants of the proposed models. The context of an urban destination is also relatively novel, as many previous studies have focused rather on individual sites. RECOMMENDATIONS Urban destinations should facilitate conditions to encourage acceptance and readiness of technology among urban tourists. This not only includes digital infrastructure (e.g. WI-FI), but digital solutions and apps (e.g. tour guides in different languages) designed to attract different target markets (i.e. generations).
不同世代城市游客的技术接受度与准备度
已经确定了技术接受和准备的几个激励因素和抑制因素,然而,使用数字工具的倾向可以根据不同的因素而变化,其中之一是用户的年龄。本研究旨在探讨城市目的地中不同世代游客的技术接受度和准备程度。本定性研究包括在2019年秋季和2020年春季(COVID-19之前)对匈牙利布达佩斯主要景点附近不同年龄段的外国游客进行的94次面对面访谈。采访收集了游客对旅游和科技的想法、经历和看法。采访录音,转录和内容分析应用演绎的方法。最重要的结果:由于缺乏技术知识和使用的挑战,婴儿潮一代在技术准备方面更受抑制,而不是积极。X一代对便利和社会影响力驱动的技术使用更为乐观。年轻一代在旅行时使用更广泛的数字工具,因为他们更加乐观和创新。然而,一些来自y一代和X一代的参与者有意识地限制技术的使用,因为他们认为这些技术具有破坏性。研究结果还表明,对于所有年龄段的人来说,激励因素往往与功利因素而非享乐因素关系更密切。智能手机和谷歌地图是最常用的数字工具。这项新颖的研究侧重于从代际角度探索所谓的“数字鸿沟”,探讨技术接受和准备的不同模型和方法。此外,本研究还探讨了所提出模型的不同决定因素之间的相关性。城市目的地的背景也相对新颖,因为许多先前的研究都侧重于单个地点。城市目的地应创造条件,鼓励城市游客接受和准备好技术。这不仅包括数字基础设施(如WI-FI),还包括旨在吸引不同目标市场(即几代人)的数字解决方案和应用程序(如不同语言的导游)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信