Case Studies and their Epistemological Potential in Design-Based Research – A Practice Illustration

Tina Emmler, Petra Frehe-Halliwell
{"title":"Case Studies and their Epistemological Potential in Design-Based Research – A Practice Illustration","authors":"Tina Emmler, Petra Frehe-Halliwell","doi":"10.15460/EDER.4.1.1556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers in DBR projects create various text products, such as interview transcripts, scientific reports and sometimes a case study[1]. Usually, case studies are only considered to be by-products created during the DBR to give the stakeholders of the project, including university students of vocational education and training, an insight into the development process and the underlying practical challenges. In this context, case studies mainly fulfil a didactic function for the stakeholders. However, we believe that case studies do not only serve as an instrument for communicating project content to others (outside the scientific community), but are a medium for the researchers themselves to ascertain their own learning processes that takes place in the exploration of the field of research. \nThat way, we are emphasizing a process-orientated perspective on DBR. We assume that the process of creating a case study has an epistemological value on its own. As we will show and try to illustrate with practical examples, creating a case study applies to very different criteria in contrast to creating scientific text products. For instance, the researcher creating a case study has to pay attention to details, the use of language and ways of communication as well as trying to capture the overall atmosphere of the organization, social groups etc. We consider this a ‘creative act’ and see many parallels to Walter Benjamin’s theory of translation[2]: In DBR it is the world of science on the one hand and the field of practice on the other that make a translation necessary: the languages applied in both fields differ, although the people working there might all belong to one and the same nationality which might allow them to communicate with the people from the other “world”. However, this does not mean that researchers understand the practice and the emerging phenomena per se. A translation between the worlds is necessary. For this, the case study is the first step. \nWe are convinced that this approach opens up a different perspective on the DBR project and focussed research interests. Developing a case study can be helpful for an overall and deep understanding of practice – which is one of the main goals for DBR conducted in the tradition of a paradigm consistent to the humanities. \nThis (additional) paper aims to illustrate how a case study can derive from the background of a DBR context. We would like to provide insight into the concrete usage of a case study approach in a DBR-project. In order to structure the case study description, we use the criteria of Reetz (1988), a German professional in vocational education training whose ideas on case studies fit to Benjamin’s idea of writing narratives.","PeriodicalId":145708,"journal":{"name":"EDeR. Educational Design Research","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDeR. Educational Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15460/EDER.4.1.1556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers in DBR projects create various text products, such as interview transcripts, scientific reports and sometimes a case study[1]. Usually, case studies are only considered to be by-products created during the DBR to give the stakeholders of the project, including university students of vocational education and training, an insight into the development process and the underlying practical challenges. In this context, case studies mainly fulfil a didactic function for the stakeholders. However, we believe that case studies do not only serve as an instrument for communicating project content to others (outside the scientific community), but are a medium for the researchers themselves to ascertain their own learning processes that takes place in the exploration of the field of research. That way, we are emphasizing a process-orientated perspective on DBR. We assume that the process of creating a case study has an epistemological value on its own. As we will show and try to illustrate with practical examples, creating a case study applies to very different criteria in contrast to creating scientific text products. For instance, the researcher creating a case study has to pay attention to details, the use of language and ways of communication as well as trying to capture the overall atmosphere of the organization, social groups etc. We consider this a ‘creative act’ and see many parallels to Walter Benjamin’s theory of translation[2]: In DBR it is the world of science on the one hand and the field of practice on the other that make a translation necessary: the languages applied in both fields differ, although the people working there might all belong to one and the same nationality which might allow them to communicate with the people from the other “world”. However, this does not mean that researchers understand the practice and the emerging phenomena per se. A translation between the worlds is necessary. For this, the case study is the first step. We are convinced that this approach opens up a different perspective on the DBR project and focussed research interests. Developing a case study can be helpful for an overall and deep understanding of practice – which is one of the main goals for DBR conducted in the tradition of a paradigm consistent to the humanities. This (additional) paper aims to illustrate how a case study can derive from the background of a DBR context. We would like to provide insight into the concrete usage of a case study approach in a DBR-project. In order to structure the case study description, we use the criteria of Reetz (1988), a German professional in vocational education training whose ideas on case studies fit to Benjamin’s idea of writing narratives.
案例研究及其在基于设计的研究中的认识论潜力——一个实践例证
DBR项目的研究人员创建各种文本产品,如访谈记录、科学报告,有时还包括案例研究[1]。通常,案例研究只被认为是在DBR期间创建的副产品,目的是让项目的利益相关者(包括接受职业教育和培训的大学生)深入了解开发过程和潜在的实际挑战。在这种情况下,案例研究主要履行了对利益相关者的教学功能。然而,我们认为,案例研究不仅是将项目内容传达给他人(科学界以外的人)的工具,而且是研究人员自己确定在研究领域探索中发生的自己的学习过程的媒介。这样,我们就强调了面向过程的DBR视角。我们假设创建案例研究的过程本身具有认识论价值。正如我们将展示并尝试用实际示例说明的那样,与创建科学文本产品相比,创建案例研究适用于非常不同的标准。例如,研究人员创建一个案例研究必须注意细节,语言的使用和沟通方式,以及试图捕捉组织,社会群体等的整体氛围。我们认为这是一种“创造性的行为”,并看到了与沃尔特·本雅明的翻译理论[2]的许多相似之处:在DBR中,一方面是科学的世界,另一方面是实践的领域,这使得翻译成为必要:在两个领域中应用的语言不同,尽管在那里工作的人可能都属于同一个民族,这可能使他们能够与来自另一个“世界”的人交流。然而,这并不意味着研究人员了解这种做法和新兴现象本身。两个世界之间的翻译是必要的。为此,案例研究是第一步。我们相信,这种方法为DBR项目开辟了一个不同的视角,并集中了研究兴趣。开展案例研究有助于对实践的全面和深入的理解——这是DBR在与人文学科一致的范式传统中进行的主要目标之一。这篇(额外的)论文旨在说明案例研究如何从DBR上下文的背景中派生出来。我们希望深入了解案例研究方法在dbr项目中的具体用法。为了构建案例研究描述,我们使用了Reetz(1988)的标准,Reetz是德国职业教育培训专家,他的案例研究理念与本雅明的写作叙事理念相吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信