Machine learning in control of functional electrical stimulation for locomotion

A. Kostov, B. Andrews, R. Stein, D. Popovic, W. W. Armstrong
{"title":"Machine learning in control of functional electrical stimulation for locomotion","authors":"A. Kostov, B. Andrews, R. Stein, D. Popovic, W. W. Armstrong","doi":"10.1109/IEMBS.1994.411975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two machine learning techniques were evaluated for automatic design of a rule-based control of functional electrical stimulation (FES) for locomotion of spinal cord injured humans. The task was to map the relationship between sensory information and the FES-control signal by using off-line supervised training. Signals were recorded using pressure sensors installed in insoles of a patient's shoes and goniometers attached across the joints of the affected leg. The FES-control signal consisted of pulses corresponding to time intervals when the patient pressed on the manual push-button to deliver the stimulation during FES-assisted ambulation. The machine learning techniques evaluated were the adaptive logic network (ALN) and inductive learning algorithm (IL). Results to date suggest that, given the same training data, the IL learned faster than ALN while both performed the test rapidly. The generalization was better with an ALN, especially if past points were used to reflect the time dimension. Both techniques were able to predict future stimulation events. An advantage of ALN was that it can be retrained with new data without losing previously collected knowledge. The advantages of IL were that IL produces explicit and comprehensible trees and that the relative importance of each sensory contribution can be quantified.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":344622,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1994.411975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Two machine learning techniques were evaluated for automatic design of a rule-based control of functional electrical stimulation (FES) for locomotion of spinal cord injured humans. The task was to map the relationship between sensory information and the FES-control signal by using off-line supervised training. Signals were recorded using pressure sensors installed in insoles of a patient's shoes and goniometers attached across the joints of the affected leg. The FES-control signal consisted of pulses corresponding to time intervals when the patient pressed on the manual push-button to deliver the stimulation during FES-assisted ambulation. The machine learning techniques evaluated were the adaptive logic network (ALN) and inductive learning algorithm (IL). Results to date suggest that, given the same training data, the IL learned faster than ALN while both performed the test rapidly. The generalization was better with an ALN, especially if past points were used to reflect the time dimension. Both techniques were able to predict future stimulation events. An advantage of ALN was that it can be retrained with new data without losing previously collected knowledge. The advantages of IL were that IL produces explicit and comprehensible trees and that the relative importance of each sensory contribution can be quantified.<>
控制运动功能电刺激的机器学习
对两种机器学习技术进行了评估,以自动设计基于规则的功能性电刺激(FES)控制脊髓损伤患者的运动。任务是通过离线监督训练来映射感官信息与fes控制信号之间的关系。信号是通过安装在病人鞋子鞋垫上的压力传感器和连接在患病腿关节上的测角仪来记录的。fes控制信号由脉冲组成,这些脉冲与患者在fes辅助下行走时按下手动按钮以传递刺激的时间间隔相对应。评估的机器学习技术是自适应逻辑网络(ALN)和归纳学习算法(IL)。迄今为止的结果表明,在给定相同的训练数据的情况下,IL比ALN学习得更快,而两者都能快速完成测试。ALN的泛化效果更好,特别是当使用过去的点来反映时间维度时。这两种技术都能够预测未来的增产事件。人工神经网络的一个优点是,它可以用新数据进行再训练,而不会丢失以前收集的知识。IL的优点是IL产生明确和可理解的树,并且每种感官贡献的相对重要性可以量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信