Evaluation of The Effectiveness of Mud Acid in Well Stimulation

A. Babalola
{"title":"Evaluation of The Effectiveness of Mud Acid in Well Stimulation","authors":"A. Babalola","doi":"10.33140/pcii.05.01.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Production enhancement from oil and gas fields is of key importance to operators. In order to achieve enhanced production, well stimulation techniques are often deployed to maximize recovery from oil and gas wells. Matrix acidizing is the most prominent technique deployed among other well stimulation techniques; considering its relatively lower cost, compared to hydraulic fracturing. Also of importance is the suitability of matrix acidizing to generate extra production and restore original productivity in wells that are damaged. Matrix acidization involves injection of an acid solution into the reservoir formation, at a pressure below the fracture pressure to dissolve some of the minerals within the rock with the key objective of removing damage near the wellbore, subsequently restoring the natural permeability and improving the well productivity. The standard acid treatments used in this work were HCl-HF (mud acid) formulations to dissolve the plugging minerals, mainly silicates (clays and feldspars). Experiments were carried out on sandstone samples that had been immersed in drilling fluid to allow cake formation and mud cake samples to evaluate the effectiveness of the formulated acids in well stimulation. Three standard mud acid concentrations were prepared, (13% HCl-3% HF, 17% HCl-5% HF and 24% HCl-6% HF).Results derived from the experiments indicated that the highest concentration of acid used (24% HCl-6% HF), gave a good result (8.05% of the original mass was dissolved). For the experiments involving the mud cake, the highest concentration of acid used (24% HCl-6% HF) gave a good result (94.86% of the original mass was dissolved). This showed that the higher concentration mud acid was a good candidate for skin removal in sandstone reservoirs, and wellbores that have been damaged by drilling fluid invasion.","PeriodicalId":355186,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum and Chemical Industry International","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum and Chemical Industry International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/pcii.05.01.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Production enhancement from oil and gas fields is of key importance to operators. In order to achieve enhanced production, well stimulation techniques are often deployed to maximize recovery from oil and gas wells. Matrix acidizing is the most prominent technique deployed among other well stimulation techniques; considering its relatively lower cost, compared to hydraulic fracturing. Also of importance is the suitability of matrix acidizing to generate extra production and restore original productivity in wells that are damaged. Matrix acidization involves injection of an acid solution into the reservoir formation, at a pressure below the fracture pressure to dissolve some of the minerals within the rock with the key objective of removing damage near the wellbore, subsequently restoring the natural permeability and improving the well productivity. The standard acid treatments used in this work were HCl-HF (mud acid) formulations to dissolve the plugging minerals, mainly silicates (clays and feldspars). Experiments were carried out on sandstone samples that had been immersed in drilling fluid to allow cake formation and mud cake samples to evaluate the effectiveness of the formulated acids in well stimulation. Three standard mud acid concentrations were prepared, (13% HCl-3% HF, 17% HCl-5% HF and 24% HCl-6% HF).Results derived from the experiments indicated that the highest concentration of acid used (24% HCl-6% HF), gave a good result (8.05% of the original mass was dissolved). For the experiments involving the mud cake, the highest concentration of acid used (24% HCl-6% HF) gave a good result (94.86% of the original mass was dissolved). This showed that the higher concentration mud acid was a good candidate for skin removal in sandstone reservoirs, and wellbores that have been damaged by drilling fluid invasion.
泥浆酸增产效果评价
提高油气田产量对作业者来说至关重要。为了提高产量,通常采用增产技术来最大限度地提高油气井的采收率。在其他增产技术中,基质酸化是应用最突出的技术;考虑到与水力压裂相比,其成本相对较低。同样重要的是基质酸化的适用性,以产生额外的产量,并恢复受损井的原始产能。基质酸化是指在低于压裂压力的压力下,将酸性溶液注入储层,溶解岩石中的一些矿物质,主要目的是消除井筒附近的损害,从而恢复天然渗透率,提高油井产能。在这项工作中使用的标准酸处理是HCl-HF(泥浆酸)配方,以溶解堵塞矿物,主要是硅酸盐(粘土和长石)。研究人员对浸泡在钻井液中的砂岩样品进行了实验,利用饼状地层和泥浆饼状样品来评估配方酸在油井增产中的有效性。配制了三种标准泥浆酸浓度(13%盐酸-3% HF、17%盐酸-5% HF和24%盐酸-6% HF)。实验结果表明,使用最高浓度的酸(24%盐酸-6%氢氟酸),得到了良好的结果(8.05%的原始质量被溶解)。对于泥饼的实验,采用最高浓度的酸(24%盐酸-6% HF),得到了良好的结果(94.86%的原始质量被溶解)。这表明,高浓度泥浆酸是砂岩储层和受钻井液侵入破坏的井中去除表皮的良好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信