A European Half-Life? A Retrospective on Joseph Weiler's 'The Transformation of Europe'

Neil Walker
{"title":"A European Half-Life? A Retrospective on Joseph Weiler's 'The Transformation of Europe'","authors":"Neil Walker","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2200880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Joseph Weiler’s 1991 article, The Transformation of Europe (TOE), was undoubtedly a landmark in European legal scholarship, but it also marked a watershed in its author’s own approach to the European project. European legal scholarship was never the same after TOE, but nor was Joseph Weiler’s contribution to that body of scholarship. In some ways, a shift in perspective is to be expected. TOE was an agenda-reshaping piece, and it is only natural that its author should follow the new agenda that he did so much to set. That is one part of the story. However, I believe that it is also the case that the author gradually came to understand the new agenda to be less relevant, or less ‘actionable’ than previously he had, and in any case less central, either because the world had simply moved on yet again in new and unpredictable ways, or, perhaps, because the agenda had never been as open as he once believed. In this retrospective comment, I explore both parts of the story. I examine what they tell us about the evolving character of supranational Europe as a political project and also as a field of inquiry, and how this movement is both reflected in and touched by the thought of one of the leading jurists of the age. In particular, I examine Weiler's post-TOE thesis of political Messianism as a way of accounting for both the early success and the recent loss of momentum of the EU. And in introducing the metaphor of the 'half-life' as the characteristic of an entity in irreversible decline, I address the following issues: whether and to what extent Weilers' views on the trajectory of Supranational Europe are consistent with such a metaphorical depiction; precisely what such a depiction entails in terms of the EU's prognosis; and how this approach might be challenged.","PeriodicalId":230704,"journal":{"name":"University of Edinburgh School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Edinburgh School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2200880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Joseph Weiler’s 1991 article, The Transformation of Europe (TOE), was undoubtedly a landmark in European legal scholarship, but it also marked a watershed in its author’s own approach to the European project. European legal scholarship was never the same after TOE, but nor was Joseph Weiler’s contribution to that body of scholarship. In some ways, a shift in perspective is to be expected. TOE was an agenda-reshaping piece, and it is only natural that its author should follow the new agenda that he did so much to set. That is one part of the story. However, I believe that it is also the case that the author gradually came to understand the new agenda to be less relevant, or less ‘actionable’ than previously he had, and in any case less central, either because the world had simply moved on yet again in new and unpredictable ways, or, perhaps, because the agenda had never been as open as he once believed. In this retrospective comment, I explore both parts of the story. I examine what they tell us about the evolving character of supranational Europe as a political project and also as a field of inquiry, and how this movement is both reflected in and touched by the thought of one of the leading jurists of the age. In particular, I examine Weiler's post-TOE thesis of political Messianism as a way of accounting for both the early success and the recent loss of momentum of the EU. And in introducing the metaphor of the 'half-life' as the characteristic of an entity in irreversible decline, I address the following issues: whether and to what extent Weilers' views on the trajectory of Supranational Europe are consistent with such a metaphorical depiction; precisely what such a depiction entails in terms of the EU's prognosis; and how this approach might be challenged.
欧洲的半衰期?回顾约瑟夫·维勒的《欧洲的转型》
约瑟夫·韦勒(Joseph Weiler) 1991年的文章《欧洲的转型》(The Transformation of Europe, TOE)无疑是欧洲法学研究的一个里程碑,但它也标志着作者自己研究欧洲计划的一个分水岭。在TOE之后,欧洲的法律学术再也不一样了,但约瑟夫·韦勒对这一学术体系的贡献也不一样了。在某些方面,观点的转变是可以预料的。《TOE》是一篇重塑议程的文章,它的作者自然应该遵循他为之付出了巨大努力的新议程。这是故事的一部分。然而,我相信这也是作者逐渐理解新议程不那么相关,或者不那么“可操作”的情况,而且无论如何也不那么核心,要么是因为世界又以新的和不可预测的方式向前发展,或者,也许是因为议程从未像他曾经相信的那样开放。在这篇回顾性评论中,我对故事的两个部分进行了探讨。我研究了他们告诉我们的超国家欧洲作为一个政治项目和一个研究领域的演变特征,以及这一运动是如何反映并被当时一位主要法学家的思想所触动的。特别地,我研究了维勒的后toe政治弥赛亚主义理论,作为解释欧盟早期成功和最近失去动力的一种方式。在引入“半衰期”这个隐喻作为一个实体不可逆转衰退的特征时,我提出了以下问题:维勒斯关于超国家欧洲轨迹的观点是否以及在多大程度上与这种隐喻性描述相一致;确切地说,这种描述对欧盟的预测意味着什么;以及这种方法可能会受到怎样的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信