A Hybrid Machine Learning and Schedulability Analysis Method for the Verification of TSN Networks

Tieu Long Mai, N. Navet, J. Migge
{"title":"A Hybrid Machine Learning and Schedulability Analysis Method for the Verification of TSN Networks","authors":"Tieu Long Mai, N. Navet, J. Migge","doi":"10.1109/WFCS.2019.8757948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning (ML), and supervised learning in particular, can be used to learn what makes it hard for a network to be feasible and try to predict whether a network configuration will be feasible without executing a conventional schedulability analysis. A disadvantage of ML-based timing verification with respect to schedulability analysis is the possibility of “false positives”: configurations deemed feasible while they are not. In this work, in order to minimize the rate of false positives, we propose the use of a measure of the uncertainty of the prediction to drop it when the uncertainty is too high, and rely instead on schedulability analysis. In this hybrid verification strategy, the clear-cut decisions are taken by ML, while the more difficult ones are taken by a conventional schedulability analysis. Importantly, the trade-off achieved between prediction accuracy and computing time can be controlled. We apply this hybrid verification method to Ethernet TSN networks and obtain, for instance in the case of priority scheduling with 8 traffic classes, a 99% prediction accuracy with a speedup factor of 5.7 with respect to conventional schedulability analysis and a reduction of 46% of the false positives compared to ML alone.","PeriodicalId":373657,"journal":{"name":"2019 15th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 15th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WFCS.2019.8757948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Machine learning (ML), and supervised learning in particular, can be used to learn what makes it hard for a network to be feasible and try to predict whether a network configuration will be feasible without executing a conventional schedulability analysis. A disadvantage of ML-based timing verification with respect to schedulability analysis is the possibility of “false positives”: configurations deemed feasible while they are not. In this work, in order to minimize the rate of false positives, we propose the use of a measure of the uncertainty of the prediction to drop it when the uncertainty is too high, and rely instead on schedulability analysis. In this hybrid verification strategy, the clear-cut decisions are taken by ML, while the more difficult ones are taken by a conventional schedulability analysis. Importantly, the trade-off achieved between prediction accuracy and computing time can be controlled. We apply this hybrid verification method to Ethernet TSN networks and obtain, for instance in the case of priority scheduling with 8 traffic classes, a 99% prediction accuracy with a speedup factor of 5.7 with respect to conventional schedulability analysis and a reduction of 46% of the false positives compared to ML alone.
一种TSN网络验证的混合机器学习和可调度性分析方法
机器学习(ML),特别是监督学习,可以用来了解网络难以实现的原因,并尝试在不执行常规可调度性分析的情况下预测网络配置是否可行。基于ml的时间验证在可调度性分析方面的一个缺点是可能出现“误报”:配置被认为是可行的,但实际上并非如此。在这项工作中,为了最大限度地减少误报率,我们建议在不确定性过高时使用预测的不确定性度量来降低它,并依赖于可调度性分析。在这种混合验证策略中,明确的决策由ML做出,而更困难的决策由传统的可调度性分析做出。重要的是,可以控制预测精度和计算时间之间的权衡。我们将这种混合验证方法应用于以太网TSN网络,并获得,例如,在具有8个流量类别的优先级调度的情况下,与传统的可调度性分析相比,预测准确率为99%,加速系数为5.7,与ML单独相比,误报率减少了46%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信