Photodisintegration of 127I: Systematic Uncertainties of Experiments and Data Evaluated Using Physical Criteria

V. Varlamov, A. Davydov, V. Orlin
{"title":"Photodisintegration of 127I: Systematic Uncertainties of Experiments and Data Evaluated Using Physical Criteria","authors":"V. Varlamov, A. Davydov, V. Orlin","doi":"10.11648/J.AJPA.20200805.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experimental data for photoneutron reaction cross sections for 127I obtained using beams of quasimonoenergetic annihilation photons and the method of neutron multiplicity-sorting at Livermore (USA) and Saclay (France) were analyzed using objective physical data reliability criteria. It was found that data of both laboratories contain significant systematic uncertainties and therefore are not reliable. New data for partial and total photoneutron reactions cross sections for 127I satisfied physical criteria of data reliability were evaluated using experimental-theoretical method based on both experimental neutron yield reaction cross-section and results of calculation in the combined photonucleon reaction model (CPNRM). The neutron yield reaction cross-section obtained at Saclay (France) was used in evaluation procedure. The newly evaluated cross sections for partial (γ, 1n), (γ, 2n) and (γ, 3n) reactions for 127I were used for discussion in detail the problems of significant disagreements between experimental data for many nuclei obtained at Saclay and Livermore. It was found that systematic uncertainties of experimental data for the (γ, 1n), (γ, 2n), and (γ, 3n) reactions cross sections for 127I obtained at both laboratories are of different nature. One of the reasons of noticeable systematic uncertainties of cross sections obtained are the shortcomings of the procedures used to separate counts into 1n, 2n, and 3n events. At the same time it was shown that the main reason of significant disagreements between new evaluated data and data obtained at Livermore experiment for 127I is the loss of many neutrons from the (γ, 1n) reaction. This situation is analogous to those in Livermore experiments for 75As and 181Ta.","PeriodicalId":329149,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physics and Applications","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physics and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJPA.20200805.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The experimental data for photoneutron reaction cross sections for 127I obtained using beams of quasimonoenergetic annihilation photons and the method of neutron multiplicity-sorting at Livermore (USA) and Saclay (France) were analyzed using objective physical data reliability criteria. It was found that data of both laboratories contain significant systematic uncertainties and therefore are not reliable. New data for partial and total photoneutron reactions cross sections for 127I satisfied physical criteria of data reliability were evaluated using experimental-theoretical method based on both experimental neutron yield reaction cross-section and results of calculation in the combined photonucleon reaction model (CPNRM). The neutron yield reaction cross-section obtained at Saclay (France) was used in evaluation procedure. The newly evaluated cross sections for partial (γ, 1n), (γ, 2n) and (γ, 3n) reactions for 127I were used for discussion in detail the problems of significant disagreements between experimental data for many nuclei obtained at Saclay and Livermore. It was found that systematic uncertainties of experimental data for the (γ, 1n), (γ, 2n), and (γ, 3n) reactions cross sections for 127I obtained at both laboratories are of different nature. One of the reasons of noticeable systematic uncertainties of cross sections obtained are the shortcomings of the procedures used to separate counts into 1n, 2n, and 3n events. At the same time it was shown that the main reason of significant disagreements between new evaluated data and data obtained at Livermore experiment for 127I is the loss of many neutrons from the (γ, 1n) reaction. This situation is analogous to those in Livermore experiments for 75As and 181Ta.
127I的光分解:用物理准则评价实验和数据的系统不确定度
利用准单能湮灭光子束和中子多重分选方法在美国利弗莫尔和法国萨克莱获得的127I光子中子反应截面实验数据,采用客观的物理数据可靠性标准进行了分析。我们发现两个实验室的数据都包含显著的系统不确定性,因此不可靠。基于实验中子产额反应截面和光子-核子联合反应模型(CPNRM)计算结果,采用实验-理论方法对127I的部分和全部光子-中子反应截面的新数据进行了可靠性评定。在法国Saclay获得的中子产率反应截面被用于评估程序。对127I的部分(γ, 1n), (γ, 2n)和(γ, 3n)反应的新计算截面进行了详细讨论,讨论了在Saclay和Livermore获得的许多原子核的实验数据之间存在重大分歧的问题。结果发现,在两个实验室获得的127I (γ, 1n)、(γ, 2n)和(γ, 3n)反应截面实验数据的系统不确定度具有不同的性质。所获得的横截面具有明显的系统不确定性的原因之一是用于将计数分为1n, 2n和3n事件的程序的缺点。同时指出,127I的新评估数据与利弗莫尔实验数据之间存在显著差异的主要原因是(γ, 1n)反应损失了许多中子。这种情况类似于利弗莫尔实验中75As和181Ta的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信