ABDOMINAL BRACING MANEVRASININ FARKLI DİZ FLEKSİYON AÇILARINDA, KUADRİSEPS ZİRVE TORKU, ZİRVE TORKA ULAŞMA SÜRESİ VE KAS AKTİVASYONU ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Bensu Söğüt, Deniz Can Şahi̇n, Damla Arslan, Sercan Yilli, Sümeyya Tarkan, Gülcan Harput
{"title":"ABDOMINAL BRACING MANEVRASININ FARKLI DİZ FLEKSİYON AÇILARINDA, KUADRİSEPS ZİRVE TORKU, ZİRVE TORKA ULAŞMA SÜRESİ VE KAS AKTİVASYONU ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ","authors":"Bensu Söğüt, Deniz Can Şahi̇n, Damla Arslan, Sercan Yilli, Sümeyya Tarkan, Gülcan Harput","doi":"10.21653/tjpr.980356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of abdominal bracing maneuver (ABM) on quadriceps peak torque (PT), time to peak torque (TTPT) and activation levels during quadriceps maximal strength testing in healthy individuals.\nMethods: Sixteen healthy individuals (Age: 24.63±1.67 years) participated in this study. Each participant was thought the ABM technique by a physical therapist. Surface electromyographic was used to measure internal oblique/transversus abdominis, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis and rectus femoris activation levels. Isokinetic dynamometry was used to measure quadriceps PT and TTPT during maximum isometric testing at 60° and 90° of knee flexion angles. Repeated measures of ANOVA was used to statistical analysis.\nResults: There was a significant angle by condition interaction for quadriceps PT (F(1,15)=5.30, p=0.04). PT values both decreased with ABM, but the decrease was greater at 60 compared to 90 degrees of knee flexion (60°: p=0.001, ES=0.68; 90°: p=0.008, ES=0.33). Quadriceps activation levels also decreased with ABM (p=0.04). \nConclusion: The present study reveals that ABM could decrease the muscle activation levels and peak torque during maximal quadriceps strength testing. Investigators should examine the compensatory lumbopelvic movements during maximal quadriceps strength testing to prevent misleading by the force transmission.","PeriodicalId":289913,"journal":{"name":"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.980356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of abdominal bracing maneuver (ABM) on quadriceps peak torque (PT), time to peak torque (TTPT) and activation levels during quadriceps maximal strength testing in healthy individuals. Methods: Sixteen healthy individuals (Age: 24.63±1.67 years) participated in this study. Each participant was thought the ABM technique by a physical therapist. Surface electromyographic was used to measure internal oblique/transversus abdominis, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis and rectus femoris activation levels. Isokinetic dynamometry was used to measure quadriceps PT and TTPT during maximum isometric testing at 60° and 90° of knee flexion angles. Repeated measures of ANOVA was used to statistical analysis. Results: There was a significant angle by condition interaction for quadriceps PT (F(1,15)=5.30, p=0.04). PT values both decreased with ABM, but the decrease was greater at 60 compared to 90 degrees of knee flexion (60°: p=0.001, ES=0.68; 90°: p=0.008, ES=0.33). Quadriceps activation levels also decreased with ABM (p=0.04). Conclusion: The present study reveals that ABM could decrease the muscle activation levels and peak torque during maximal quadriceps strength testing. Investigators should examine the compensatory lumbopelvic movements during maximal quadriceps strength testing to prevent misleading by the force transmission.
目的:本研究的目的是探讨腹部支撑操作(ABM)对健康人四头肌最大力量测试中四头肌峰值扭矩(PT)、峰值扭矩时间(TTPT)和激活水平的影响。方法:健康成人16例,年龄24.63±1.67岁。每个参与者都被物理治疗师认为是ABM技术。采用表面肌电图测量内部腹斜肌/腹横肌、股内侧肌、股外侧肌和股直肌的激活水平。在膝关节屈曲角度为60°和90°的最大等距测试中,使用等速动力学测量股四头肌PT和TTPT。采用重复方差分析进行统计分析。结果:股四头肌PT存在明显的角度-条件相互作用(F(1,15)=5.30, p=0.04)。PT值均随ABM而下降,但与90度屈曲相比,60度屈曲时PT值下降更大(60度:p=0.001, ES=0.68;90°:p=0.008, ES=0.33)。股四头肌激活水平也随ABM而降低(p=0.04)。结论:ABM能降低股四头肌最大力量测试时的肌肉激活水平和峰值扭矩。研究者应该在最大股四头肌力量测试中检查代偿性腰骨盆运动,以防止被力传递误导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信