Prototype Theory and the Classification of Offenses in a Revised Model Penal Code: A General Approach to the Special Part

S. Green
{"title":"Prototype Theory and the Classification of Offenses in a Revised Model Penal Code: A General Approach to the Special Part","authors":"S. Green","doi":"10.1525/NCLR.2000.4.1.301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How we classify offenses is fundamental to how we think about criminal law. Following the recent tentative determination by the American Law Institute's Program Committee to revisit the Model Code, the paper considers the principles that animate the Code's classification of offenses and, more broadly, the possibility of developing a general theory of the criminal law's Special Part. Drawing on insights regarding classification developed in the literature on cognitive science, the paper seeks to show how concepts of prototype classification, family resemblance, fuzzy boundaries, cognitive economy, central members, and basic level categorization all are relevant to the classification of criminal offenses. The paper then attempts to show how such analysis is useful in resolving structural questions concerning gaps and overlaps in coverage, the reorganization of offense categories, the addition of new offenses, and the omission of old ones. Particular offenses considered include computer crimes, carjacking and vehicular homicide, drug offenses, racketeering, theft, and regulatory crimes.","PeriodicalId":344882,"journal":{"name":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.2000.4.1.301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

How we classify offenses is fundamental to how we think about criminal law. Following the recent tentative determination by the American Law Institute's Program Committee to revisit the Model Code, the paper considers the principles that animate the Code's classification of offenses and, more broadly, the possibility of developing a general theory of the criminal law's Special Part. Drawing on insights regarding classification developed in the literature on cognitive science, the paper seeks to show how concepts of prototype classification, family resemblance, fuzzy boundaries, cognitive economy, central members, and basic level categorization all are relevant to the classification of criminal offenses. The paper then attempts to show how such analysis is useful in resolving structural questions concerning gaps and overlaps in coverage, the reorganization of offense categories, the addition of new offenses, and the omission of old ones. Particular offenses considered include computer crimes, carjacking and vehicular homicide, drug offenses, racketeering, theft, and regulatory crimes.
原型理论与修订的示范刑法典中的犯罪分类——对特殊部分的一般解读
我们如何对犯罪进行分类是我们如何看待刑法的基础。继美国法律研究所项目委员会最近对《示范法典》进行重新审视的初步决定之后,本文考虑了使《示范法典》的犯罪分类生动起来的原则,以及更广泛地说,发展刑法特殊部分一般理论的可能性。根据认知科学文献中关于分类的见解,本文试图说明原型分类、家族相似性、模糊边界、认知经济、中心成员和基本层次分类等概念如何与刑事犯罪分类相关。然后,本文试图说明这种分析如何有助于解决涉及范围的差距和重叠、犯罪类别的重组、新犯罪的增加和旧犯罪的遗漏等结构性问题。特别考虑的犯罪包括计算机犯罪、劫车和车辆杀人、毒品犯罪、敲诈勒索、盗窃和监管犯罪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信