International Policies and Conventions on International Rivers and the Rights of Ethiopia to Construct Dam on Nile River: The Case of the Great Renaissance Dam of Ethiopia

Kassahun Mulatu Lemt
{"title":"International Policies and Conventions on International Rivers and the Rights of Ethiopia to Construct Dam on Nile River: The Case of the Great Renaissance Dam of Ethiopia","authors":"Kassahun Mulatu Lemt","doi":"10.7176/iags/83-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable transboundary water resources managements are challenged by water governance problem. Equitable and reasonable use of water resources shared by co-basin countries requires reliable common agreements. International water laws such as UN Watercourses (1997), Helsinki Rules (1966) have provided vital legal instruments for effective management and negotiation over international water courses. However, Nile River use and development has challenged for last several decades due to discriminatory bilateral agreements made during colonial periods. The Cooperative Framework Agreement (CFA) provided to achieve equitable use of Nile River and promote regional socioeconomic development is important step advancing to stop unfair water allocation and claim in the region. The enduring claim over water share and use by Egypt and Sudan referring colonial era agreements are unacceptable because they denied legal and natural rights of the upstream countries as well as opposed international water law. With this respect, Ethiopia has natural and legal right to construct Great Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. The downstream countries (Egypt and Sudan) should ratify CFA and respect international water laws. Therefore, mutually acceptable cooperative commitment amongst the riparian states of the Nile basin is the only necessary condition for promoting sustainable use and development Nile River as well as achieving peace and security in the Nile river basin. Keywords: UN Watercourses, Helsinki Rules, Nile River basin, downstream countries, international water law principles DOI: 10.7176/IAGS/83-02 Publication date: June 30 th 2020","PeriodicalId":358479,"journal":{"name":"International Affairs and Global Strategy","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Affairs and Global Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/iags/83-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable transboundary water resources managements are challenged by water governance problem. Equitable and reasonable use of water resources shared by co-basin countries requires reliable common agreements. International water laws such as UN Watercourses (1997), Helsinki Rules (1966) have provided vital legal instruments for effective management and negotiation over international water courses. However, Nile River use and development has challenged for last several decades due to discriminatory bilateral agreements made during colonial periods. The Cooperative Framework Agreement (CFA) provided to achieve equitable use of Nile River and promote regional socioeconomic development is important step advancing to stop unfair water allocation and claim in the region. The enduring claim over water share and use by Egypt and Sudan referring colonial era agreements are unacceptable because they denied legal and natural rights of the upstream countries as well as opposed international water law. With this respect, Ethiopia has natural and legal right to construct Great Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. The downstream countries (Egypt and Sudan) should ratify CFA and respect international water laws. Therefore, mutually acceptable cooperative commitment amongst the riparian states of the Nile basin is the only necessary condition for promoting sustainable use and development Nile River as well as achieving peace and security in the Nile river basin. Keywords: UN Watercourses, Helsinki Rules, Nile River basin, downstream countries, international water law principles DOI: 10.7176/IAGS/83-02 Publication date: June 30 th 2020
关于国际河流的国际政策、公约与埃塞俄比亚在尼罗河上修建大坝的权利——以埃塞俄比亚的复兴大坝为例
可持续的跨界水资源管理受到水治理问题的挑战。公平合理地利用共同流域国家共享的水资源需要可靠的共同协议。《联合国水道法》(1997年)、《赫尔辛基规则》(1966年)等国际水法为有效管理和谈判国际水道提供了重要的法律文书。然而,由于殖民时期签订的歧视性双边协议,尼罗河的使用和开发在过去几十年里一直受到挑战。《合作框架协议》(CFA)旨在实现尼罗河的公平利用,促进区域社会经济发展,是制止该地区不公平水资源分配和用水要求的重要一步。埃及和苏丹援引殖民时代的协议对水资源的分享和使用提出持久的要求是不可接受的,因为它们否认了上游国家的合法和自然权利,并反对国际水法。在这方面,埃塞俄比亚有自然和合法的权利建设大埃塞俄比亚复兴大坝。下游国家(埃及和苏丹)应该批准CFA并尊重国际水法。因此,尼罗河流域沿岸国家之间相互接受的合作承诺是促进尼罗河的可持续利用和发展以及实现尼罗河流域和平与安全的唯一必要条件。关键词:联合国水道,赫尔辛基规则,尼罗河流域,下游国家,国际水法原则DOI: 10.7176/IAGS/83-02出版日期:2020年6月30日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信