THE LINKS BETWEEN THE 9TH GRADE STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT GOALS ORIENTATIONS AND PERCEIVED SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT

A. Augustinienė, Berita Simonaitienė, R. Erentaitė, Rimantas Vosylis, Saulė Raižienė
{"title":"THE LINKS BETWEEN THE 9TH GRADE STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT GOALS ORIENTATIONS AND PERCEIVED SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT","authors":"A. Augustinienė, Berita Simonaitienė, R. Erentaitė, Rimantas Vosylis, Saulė Raižienė","doi":"10.21125/edulearn.2020.2156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the stage of middle adolescence educational goals become salient for students. However, their salience may change over the period of late adolescence (Massey et al, 2008). From the perspective of achievement motivation (Law, Elliot, & Murayama, 2012), achievement goals are considered to be cognitive-dynamic goals focused on educational competence. School goal structure refers to goal-related messages made salient by the policies, practices, and communication strategies that teachers employ with students (Park, et al., 2018). Students adopt the achievement goals that match the goals stressed in their environment. Pursuing mastery-approach goals is more beneficial for students’ deeper learning, well-being and long-term outcomes than pursuing performance goals (Elliot & Hulleman, 2017). Metaanalysis of research over the past 30 years showed that the relations between school goal structures and achievement goals are robust and largely unbiased. However, the understanding of the relation between goal structures and achievement goals is insufficient (Bardach,et al., 2019). Therefore, the objectives of this two-wave study are twofold: (1) to investigate how the 9th grade students’ achievement goal orientations and perceived school goal structure change over a school year and (2) to evaluate the (strength of the) relationship between the 9th grade students perceived school goal structures and achievement goals in two measurement waves ( W1 and W2). It is not clear how Covid-19 pandemic situation with emphasis on distance learning affected students‘ motivation, so it is important to evaluate students’ perceived school goals structure and achievement goals orientation in the 2020 spring semester (W2) as the different learning contexts might affect motivation and learning processes differently.","PeriodicalId":345570,"journal":{"name":"EDULEARN20 Proceedings","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDULEARN20 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2020.2156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the stage of middle adolescence educational goals become salient for students. However, their salience may change over the period of late adolescence (Massey et al, 2008). From the perspective of achievement motivation (Law, Elliot, & Murayama, 2012), achievement goals are considered to be cognitive-dynamic goals focused on educational competence. School goal structure refers to goal-related messages made salient by the policies, practices, and communication strategies that teachers employ with students (Park, et al., 2018). Students adopt the achievement goals that match the goals stressed in their environment. Pursuing mastery-approach goals is more beneficial for students’ deeper learning, well-being and long-term outcomes than pursuing performance goals (Elliot & Hulleman, 2017). Metaanalysis of research over the past 30 years showed that the relations between school goal structures and achievement goals are robust and largely unbiased. However, the understanding of the relation between goal structures and achievement goals is insufficient (Bardach,et al., 2019). Therefore, the objectives of this two-wave study are twofold: (1) to investigate how the 9th grade students’ achievement goal orientations and perceived school goal structure change over a school year and (2) to evaluate the (strength of the) relationship between the 9th grade students perceived school goal structures and achievement goals in two measurement waves ( W1 and W2). It is not clear how Covid-19 pandemic situation with emphasis on distance learning affected students‘ motivation, so it is important to evaluate students’ perceived school goals structure and achievement goals orientation in the 2020 spring semester (W2) as the different learning contexts might affect motivation and learning processes differently.
九年级学生成就目标取向与学校环境感知的关系
在青少年中期,教育目标对学生的影响日益突出。然而,它们的显著性可能在青春期后期发生变化(Massey et al, 2008)。从成就动机的角度来看(Law, Elliot, & Murayama, 2012),成就目标被认为是关注教育能力的认知动态目标。学校目标结构是指教师对学生采用的政策、实践和沟通策略所突出的与目标相关的信息(Park, et al., 2018)。学生采用与他们所处环境所强调的目标相匹配的成就目标。追求精通型目标比追求绩效目标更有利于学生的深度学习、幸福感和长期成果(Elliot & Hulleman, 2017)。对过去30年研究的荟萃分析表明,学校目标结构与成就目标之间的关系是稳健的,并且在很大程度上是无偏倚的。然而,对目标结构与成就目标之间关系的理解不足(Bardach,et al., 2019)。因此,本双波研究的目的是:(1)调查九年级学生的成就目标取向和学校目标感知结构在一个学年期间的变化情况;(2)在两个测量波(W1和W2)中评估九年级学生的学校目标感知结构与成就目标之间的关系(强度)。目前尚不清楚以远程学习为重点的新冠肺炎疫情如何影响学生的学习动机,因此,在2020年春季学期(W2),评估学生对学校目标结构和成就目标取向的感知非常重要,因为不同的学习环境可能会对动机和学习过程产生不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信