P189 Use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in COVID-19 infection does not adversely affect clinical outcomes including need for non-invasive and invasive ventilation

A. Amrapala, M. Win, A. Ainley
{"title":"P189 Use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in COVID-19 infection does not adversely affect clinical outcomes including need for non-invasive and invasive ventilation","authors":"A. Amrapala, M. Win, A. Ainley","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionIt has been hypothesized that use of Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE-I) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) are associated with worse outcomes in COVID-19 through upregulation of ACE2 receptors.1 Recent studies have shown no association between ACE-I/ARB use and increased mortality but there is limited information on other markers of disease severity such as Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) requirement and need for intubation. We assessed the effect of ACE-I/ARB on the outcomes of COVID-19 patients.MethodsA retrospective observational study of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the respiratory units during a 1-year period. Patient demographics, clinical and medication history and clinical outcomes were extracted from written and electronic records. Primary outcomes – LOS, CPAP requirement, intensive care (ICU) admission, intubation and death – were compared between those who received ACE-I/ARB concurrently with their COVID-19 treatment and those who did not. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared test and odds ratio (OR).ResultsOf 521 patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 (median age 59 years, 62.6% male), 183 (35.1%) required CPAP, 108 (20.7%) were admitted to ICU, 60 (11.5%) were intubated and 41 (7.9%) died. In total, 151 (29%) were on ACE-I/ARB treatment, most commonly for hypertension. There was no difference in median LOS between those on ACE-I/ARB treatment and those not (11 and 10 days respectively, p=0.20). There was no difference between CPAP requirement (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.71–1.56), admission to intensive care (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50–1.36), intubation (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43–1.58) and death (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.53–2.11) between the two groups (p>0.05).ConclusionThere was no difference in clinical outcomes between COVID-19 patients on ACE-I/ARB and those who were not, in particular with regards to need for non-invasive and invasive ventilation. Our findings support current recommendations for continued use of ACE-I/ARB in COVID-19 infection.ReferenceFang L, et al. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? The Lancet. Respiratory medicine 2020;8(4):e21. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8","PeriodicalId":143926,"journal":{"name":"Fighting back: optimising treatment for COVID-19","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fighting back: optimising treatment for COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

IntroductionIt has been hypothesized that use of Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE-I) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) are associated with worse outcomes in COVID-19 through upregulation of ACE2 receptors.1 Recent studies have shown no association between ACE-I/ARB use and increased mortality but there is limited information on other markers of disease severity such as Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) requirement and need for intubation. We assessed the effect of ACE-I/ARB on the outcomes of COVID-19 patients.MethodsA retrospective observational study of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the respiratory units during a 1-year period. Patient demographics, clinical and medication history and clinical outcomes were extracted from written and electronic records. Primary outcomes – LOS, CPAP requirement, intensive care (ICU) admission, intubation and death – were compared between those who received ACE-I/ARB concurrently with their COVID-19 treatment and those who did not. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared test and odds ratio (OR).ResultsOf 521 patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 (median age 59 years, 62.6% male), 183 (35.1%) required CPAP, 108 (20.7%) were admitted to ICU, 60 (11.5%) were intubated and 41 (7.9%) died. In total, 151 (29%) were on ACE-I/ARB treatment, most commonly for hypertension. There was no difference in median LOS between those on ACE-I/ARB treatment and those not (11 and 10 days respectively, p=0.20). There was no difference between CPAP requirement (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.71–1.56), admission to intensive care (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50–1.36), intubation (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43–1.58) and death (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.53–2.11) between the two groups (p>0.05).ConclusionThere was no difference in clinical outcomes between COVID-19 patients on ACE-I/ARB and those who were not, in particular with regards to need for non-invasive and invasive ventilation. Our findings support current recommendations for continued use of ACE-I/ARB in COVID-19 infection.ReferenceFang L, et al. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? The Lancet. Respiratory medicine 2020;8(4):e21. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8
P189在COVID-19感染中使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂不会对临床结果产生不利影响,包括需要无创和有创通气
有假设认为,使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-I)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)通过上调ACE2受体与COVID-19患者预后恶化相关最近的研究表明,ACE-I/ARB的使用与死亡率增加之间没有关联,但关于疾病严重程度的其他标记(如持续气道正压通气(CPAP)需求和插管需求)的信息有限。我们评估了ACE-I/ARB对COVID-19患者预后的影响。方法回顾性观察我院1年内收治的疑似或确诊COVID-19患者。从书面和电子记录中提取患者人口统计资料、临床和用药史以及临床结果。比较了在治疗COVID-19的同时接受ACE-I/ARB治疗的患者和未接受ACE-I/ARB治疗的患者的主要结局——LOS、CPAP要求、重症监护(ICU)入院、插管和死亡。采用卡方检验和比值比(OR)进行统计学分析。结果521例疑似或确诊COVID-19患者(中位年龄59岁,男性62.6%),183例(35.1%)需要CPAP, 108例(20.7%)入住ICU, 60例(11.5%)插管,41例(7.9%)死亡。总共有151例(29%)接受了ACE-I/ARB治疗,最常见的是高血压。ACE-I/ARB治疗组和未治疗组的中位LOS无差异(分别为11天和10天,p=0.20)。两组间CPAP需要量(OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.71-1.56)、重症监护入院(OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-1.36)、插管(OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-1.58)和死亡(OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.53-2.11)均无差异(p>0.05)。结论采用ACE-I/ARB治疗的COVID-19患者的临床结局与未采用ACE-I/ARB治疗的患者无差异,特别是在无创和有创通气需求方面。我们的研究结果支持目前关于在COVID-19感染中继续使用ACE-I/ARB的建议。方林,等。高血压和糖尿病患者感染COVID-19的风险增加吗?《柳叶刀》杂志上。呼吸医学2020;8(4):e21。doi: 10.1016 / s2213 - 2600 (20) 30116 - 8
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信