Minimizing Remote Accesses in MapReduce Clusters

Prateek Tandon, Michael J. Cafarella, T. Wenisch
{"title":"Minimizing Remote Accesses in MapReduce Clusters","authors":"Prateek Tandon, Michael J. Cafarella, T. Wenisch","doi":"10.1109/IPDPSW.2013.195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MapReduce, in particular Hadoop, is a popular framework for the distributed processing of large datasets on clusters of relatively inexpensive servers. Although Hadoop clusters are highly scalable and ensure data availability in the face of server failures, their efficiency is poor. We study data placement as a potential source of inefficiency. Despite networking improvements that have narrowed the performance gap between map tasks that access local or remote data, we find that nodes servicing remote HDFS requests see significant slowdowns of collocated map tasks due to interference effects, whereas nodes making these requests do not experience proportionate slowdowns. To reduce remote accesses, and thus avoid their destructive performance interference, we investigate an intelligent data placement policy we call 'partitioned data placement'. We find that, in an unconstrained cluster where a job's map tasks may be scheduled dynamically on any node over time, Hadoop's default random data placement is effective in avoiding remote accesses. However, when task placement is restricted by long-running jobs or other reservations, partitioned data placement substantially reduces remote access rates (e.g., by as much as 86% over random placement for a job allocated only one-third of a cluster).","PeriodicalId":234552,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW.2013.195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

MapReduce, in particular Hadoop, is a popular framework for the distributed processing of large datasets on clusters of relatively inexpensive servers. Although Hadoop clusters are highly scalable and ensure data availability in the face of server failures, their efficiency is poor. We study data placement as a potential source of inefficiency. Despite networking improvements that have narrowed the performance gap between map tasks that access local or remote data, we find that nodes servicing remote HDFS requests see significant slowdowns of collocated map tasks due to interference effects, whereas nodes making these requests do not experience proportionate slowdowns. To reduce remote accesses, and thus avoid their destructive performance interference, we investigate an intelligent data placement policy we call 'partitioned data placement'. We find that, in an unconstrained cluster where a job's map tasks may be scheduled dynamically on any node over time, Hadoop's default random data placement is effective in avoiding remote accesses. However, when task placement is restricted by long-running jobs or other reservations, partitioned data placement substantially reduces remote access rates (e.g., by as much as 86% over random placement for a job allocated only one-third of a cluster).
最小化MapReduce集群中的远程访问
MapReduce,特别是Hadoop,是一个流行的框架,用于在相对便宜的服务器集群上分布式处理大型数据集。尽管Hadoop集群具有高度可扩展性,并且在服务器故障时确保数据可用性,但它们的效率很低。我们将数据放置作为低效率的潜在来源进行研究。尽管网络改进缩小了访问本地或远程数据的map任务之间的性能差距,但我们发现服务远程HDFS请求的节点由于干扰效应而导致并配的map任务明显变慢,而发出这些请求的节点则没有相应的变慢。为了减少远程访问,从而避免其破坏性的性能干扰,我们研究了一种智能数据放置策略,我们称之为“分区数据放置”。我们发现,在一个不受约束的集群中,随着时间的推移,作业的映射任务可以在任何节点上动态调度,Hadoop的默认随机数据放置可以有效地避免远程访问。然而,当任务放置受到长时间运行的作业或其他保留的限制时,分区数据放置大大降低了远程访问率(例如,对于只分配了集群三分之一的作业,分区数据放置比随机放置降低了86%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信