Design of a Hydrokinetic Turbine for Energy Ships Applications With Combined Extended Analytical Betz-Schmidt Method and Numerical Simulations CFD

P. Epple, Jonas Holzbrecher, M. Steppert, M. Platzer
{"title":"Design of a Hydrokinetic Turbine for Energy Ships Applications With Combined Extended Analytical Betz-Schmidt Method and Numerical Simulations CFD","authors":"P. Epple, Jonas Holzbrecher, M. Steppert, M. Platzer","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The energy available for a sailing ship is a combination of wind energy and the energy in the water. The wind energy propels the ship blowing into the sail and in this way generates the thrust. The energy in the water can be transformed into electrical energy by means of a hydrokinetic turbine. The electrical energy can be stored in a battery or it can be converted into hydrogen by means of an electrolyzer. In such a combination the ship is called an energy ship.\n In this work a new extended design method for the hydrokinetic turbine of the energy ship is presented and three different design variations based on Betz theory have been developed and verified with computational fluid dynamics CFD. The first Betz Standard (BS) design is based on the optimum turbine design according to Betz which is based on linear momentum theory. The second Betz Extended (BE) and third Propeller Like (PL) designs are also based on the theory of Betz but with an optimized extended airfoil length.\n The theory and the design methods for each turbine are presented. The setup and the results of the numerical simulations are shown in detail and the advantages and disadvantages of each design method are discussed. Especially the different turbine characteristics, i.e. the axial force acting on the turbine, the torque and power including their dimensionless coefficients are analyzed and compared.\n As an example, in a first analytical ideal design calculation according to the Betz theory, assuming a diameter of 890 mm and a ship velocity of 5.2 m/s, a power output of 25.8 kW was predicted for the BS design. With tip and profile losses the expected output is 21.9 kW. The results of the numerical calculation of the hydrokinetic turbine characteristics show that it has a typical behaviour as also found in wind turbines. The BS and BE design have its maximum power output near the design point at the design tip speed ratio λDBS = λDBE = 7. For the PL design λDPL is not known a priori but by means of the CFD results it is shown to be in the range of 4 < λDPL < 5. The BS design shows a maximum power output of about 17 kW with a power coefficient of cp = 0.4 at λOBS = 6.5. The BE and the PL designs show approximately the same maximum power output of about 21 kW with a power coefficient of cp ≈ 0.5 and hence are close to the predicted design output with losses. The BE and PL turbines show their maximum power output at λOBE = 5 respectively at λOPL = 4.2. However, the BE design has a much flatter power characteristics delivering the 21 kW over a much larger range of tip speed ratio, showing the advantage of this new design method. The extended airfoil surface of the BE design and the BS turbine design leads to a higher hydrodynamic resistance but also to a higher torque and power output. With those two designs, a power coefficient of almost 50% was achieved, quite close to the maximum theoretical possible power coefficient of Betz cp,Betz = 16/27 = 59.3%. Hence this is in the range achieved by wind turbines.","PeriodicalId":112698,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-70051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The energy available for a sailing ship is a combination of wind energy and the energy in the water. The wind energy propels the ship blowing into the sail and in this way generates the thrust. The energy in the water can be transformed into electrical energy by means of a hydrokinetic turbine. The electrical energy can be stored in a battery or it can be converted into hydrogen by means of an electrolyzer. In such a combination the ship is called an energy ship. In this work a new extended design method for the hydrokinetic turbine of the energy ship is presented and three different design variations based on Betz theory have been developed and verified with computational fluid dynamics CFD. The first Betz Standard (BS) design is based on the optimum turbine design according to Betz which is based on linear momentum theory. The second Betz Extended (BE) and third Propeller Like (PL) designs are also based on the theory of Betz but with an optimized extended airfoil length. The theory and the design methods for each turbine are presented. The setup and the results of the numerical simulations are shown in detail and the advantages and disadvantages of each design method are discussed. Especially the different turbine characteristics, i.e. the axial force acting on the turbine, the torque and power including their dimensionless coefficients are analyzed and compared. As an example, in a first analytical ideal design calculation according to the Betz theory, assuming a diameter of 890 mm and a ship velocity of 5.2 m/s, a power output of 25.8 kW was predicted for the BS design. With tip and profile losses the expected output is 21.9 kW. The results of the numerical calculation of the hydrokinetic turbine characteristics show that it has a typical behaviour as also found in wind turbines. The BS and BE design have its maximum power output near the design point at the design tip speed ratio λDBS = λDBE = 7. For the PL design λDPL is not known a priori but by means of the CFD results it is shown to be in the range of 4 < λDPL < 5. The BS design shows a maximum power output of about 17 kW with a power coefficient of cp = 0.4 at λOBS = 6.5. The BE and the PL designs show approximately the same maximum power output of about 21 kW with a power coefficient of cp ≈ 0.5 and hence are close to the predicted design output with losses. The BE and PL turbines show their maximum power output at λOBE = 5 respectively at λOPL = 4.2. However, the BE design has a much flatter power characteristics delivering the 21 kW over a much larger range of tip speed ratio, showing the advantage of this new design method. The extended airfoil surface of the BE design and the BS turbine design leads to a higher hydrodynamic resistance but also to a higher torque and power output. With those two designs, a power coefficient of almost 50% was achieved, quite close to the maximum theoretical possible power coefficient of Betz cp,Betz = 16/27 = 59.3%. Hence this is in the range achieved by wind turbines.
扩展解析贝茨-施密特法与数值模拟CFD相结合的能源船水动力水轮机设计
帆船可利用的能量是风能和水中能量的结合。风能推动船只吹进船帆,这样就产生了推力。通过水动力涡轮机,水中的能量可以转化为电能。电能可以储存在电池中,也可以通过电解槽转化为氢气。在这样的组合中,这艘船被称为能量船。本文提出了一种新的能源船水动力水轮机扩展设计方法,并基于Betz理论提出了三种不同的设计方案,并用计算流体力学CFD进行了验证。第一个贝茨标准(BS)设计是基于基于线性动量理论的贝茨汽轮机优化设计。第二贝茨扩展(BE)和第三螺旋桨样(PL)的设计也是基于理论的贝茨,但与优化延长翼型长度。介绍了各水轮机的原理和设计方法。详细介绍了数值模拟的建立和结果,并讨论了每种设计方法的优缺点。特别对不同涡轮特性,即作用在涡轮上的轴向力、转矩和功率及其无量纲系数进行了分析和比较。例如,在根据Betz理论进行的第一次解析理想设计计算中,假设直径为890 mm,船速为5.2 m/s,预计BS设计的输出功率为25.8 kW。考虑到叶顶和叶型损失,预期输出功率为21.9 kW。数值计算结果表明,水动力涡轮具有典型的特性,在风力发电机组中也是如此。在设计尖端速比λDBS = λDBE = 7时,BS和BE设计的最大功率输出在设计点附近。对于PL设计,λDPL是先验未知的,但通过CFD结果表明,它在4 < λDPL < 5的范围内。在λOBS = 6.5时,BS设计的最大功率输出约为17 kW,功率系数cp = 0.4。BE和PL设计显示出大约相同的最大功率输出,约为21 kW,功率系数为cp≈0.5,因此接近预测的设计输出和损耗。在λOPL = 4.2时,BE和PL涡轮的最大输出功率分别为λOBE = 5。然而,BE设计具有更平坦的功率特性,在更大的叶尖速比范围内提供21千瓦的功率,显示了这种新设计方法的优势。扩展翼型表面的BE设计和BS涡轮设计导致更高的水动力阻力,但也有更高的扭矩和功率输出。通过这两种设计,功率系数几乎达到50%,非常接近Betz cp的最大理论可能功率系数,Betz = 16/27 = 59.3%。因此,这是在风力涡轮机实现的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信