Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes with Occupant Restrained with Belt Load Limiter

J. Foret-Bruno, X. Trosseille, J. L. Coz, F. Bendjellal, C. Steyer, T. Phalempin, D. Villeforceix, P. Dandres, C. Got
{"title":"Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes with Occupant Restrained with Belt Load Limiter","authors":"J. Foret-Bruno, X. Trosseille, J. L. Coz, F. Bendjellal, C. Steyer, T. Phalempin, D. Villeforceix, P. Dandres, C. Got","doi":"10.4271/983166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In France and in other countries, research shows that the highest proportion of severe injuries and fatalities to restrained occupants occurs in frontal impacts. The oldest occupants involved in severe frontal impacts often suffer the worst thoracic injuries due to the seat belt. In France in the 1970's, some cars were equipped with load limiters making it possible to observe the relationship between force applied and occupant age with regard to thoracic risk. It has become essential, due to the ability of newer vehicles to better withstand intrusion in frontal impacts, to limit the restraint forces of seat belts that cause severe thoracic injuries, especially in elderly occupants. To address this risk, a restraint system combining belt load limitation and pyrotechnic belt pretension [the Programmed Restraint System (PRS)] has been installed in Renault cars since 1995. From static and dynamic tests performed with the load limiter, it is possible to determine the shoulder belt force applied to the occupant. 89 accident cases with equivalent energy speed of 40-80 km/hour, involving frontal collisions with cars equipped with the PRS, are reported in this paper. This study's purpose was to establish, for belted occupants, thoracic injury risk as a function of occupant age and the load applied at shoulder level. For 50% of thorax risk of AIS3+, the force for all ages is 6.9 kN. Results were obtained for 256 occupants representing age distribution similar to that of front seat occupants of the French accident file. Shoulder belt load appears to be in accordance with the occurrence of chest injuries. Other relationships between real-world accidents and post-mortem human subjects and between Hybrid III thoracic injury measurements and shoulder belt load are also investigated. This study confirms that a 6 kN force level is not enough to protect a larger proportion of the population. It is posited that a belt load limitation of 4 kN, combined with a specifically designed airbag, would protect 95% of those involved in frontal impacts from thorax injuries of AIS3+.","PeriodicalId":291036,"journal":{"name":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"81","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/983166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81

Abstract

In France and in other countries, research shows that the highest proportion of severe injuries and fatalities to restrained occupants occurs in frontal impacts. The oldest occupants involved in severe frontal impacts often suffer the worst thoracic injuries due to the seat belt. In France in the 1970's, some cars were equipped with load limiters making it possible to observe the relationship between force applied and occupant age with regard to thoracic risk. It has become essential, due to the ability of newer vehicles to better withstand intrusion in frontal impacts, to limit the restraint forces of seat belts that cause severe thoracic injuries, especially in elderly occupants. To address this risk, a restraint system combining belt load limitation and pyrotechnic belt pretension [the Programmed Restraint System (PRS)] has been installed in Renault cars since 1995. From static and dynamic tests performed with the load limiter, it is possible to determine the shoulder belt force applied to the occupant. 89 accident cases with equivalent energy speed of 40-80 km/hour, involving frontal collisions with cars equipped with the PRS, are reported in this paper. This study's purpose was to establish, for belted occupants, thoracic injury risk as a function of occupant age and the load applied at shoulder level. For 50% of thorax risk of AIS3+, the force for all ages is 6.9 kN. Results were obtained for 256 occupants representing age distribution similar to that of front seat occupants of the French accident file. Shoulder belt load appears to be in accordance with the occurrence of chest injuries. Other relationships between real-world accidents and post-mortem human subjects and between Hybrid III thoracic injury measurements and shoulder belt load are also investigated. This study confirms that a 6 kN force level is not enough to protect a larger proportion of the population. It is posited that a belt load limitation of 4 kN, combined with a specifically designed airbag, would protect 95% of those involved in frontal impacts from thorax injuries of AIS3+.
安全带负载限制器约束下汽车正面碰撞的胸部损伤风险
在法国和其他国家,研究表明,对受约束的乘员造成严重伤害和死亡的比例最高的是正面碰撞。由于安全带的原因,年龄最大的乘客在严重的正面碰撞中往往遭受最严重的胸部损伤。在20世纪70年代的法国,一些汽车配备了负载限制器,以便观察所施加的力与乘员年龄之间关于胸部风险的关系。由于新型车辆能够更好地抵御正面碰撞的侵入,限制安全带的约束力变得至关重要,安全带会导致严重的胸部损伤,尤其是对老年人。为了解决这一风险,自1995年以来,雷诺汽车安装了一种结合皮带负载限制和烟火带预紧力的约束系统(程控约束系统(PRS))。通过负载限制器进行的静态和动态测试,可以确定施加在乘员身上的肩带力。本文报道了89起等效能量速度为40-80公里/小时的车辆正面碰撞事故。本研究的目的是确定,对于系安全带的乘员,胸部损伤的风险是乘员年龄和肩部负荷的函数。对于50%的AIS3+胸腔风险,所有年龄段的力为6.9 kN。256名乘客的年龄分布与法国事故档案中前排乘客的年龄分布相似。肩带负荷似乎与胸部损伤的发生是一致的。现实世界事故与死后人类受试者之间的其他关系,以及Hybrid III胸椎损伤测量与肩带负荷之间的关系也进行了研究。这项研究证实,6千牛的力水平不足以保护大部分人口。假设安全带的负荷限制为4千牛,再加上专门设计的安全气囊,可以保护95%的正面碰撞者免受AIS3+的胸部损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信