Guest Editors's Introduction: What's Left of Asia

Hairong Yan, Daniel Vukovich
{"title":"Guest Editors's Introduction: What's Left of Asia","authors":"Hairong Yan, Daniel Vukovich","doi":"10.1215/10679847-2006-029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction to a special issue of \"Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique\" on the question of \"What's Left of Asia?\" This essay, co-authored with Yan Hairong, surveys the collected articles within the context of extant work on the meaning and history of the concept of \"Asia\" within area studies and inter-Asian cultural studies. It also grounds such academic work in the context of past imperial/colonial histories of Asia and within the current globalization of capitalism in the region. \"Asia\" remains an inherently problematic concept-metaphor for a radically diverse, discontinuous, and conflicted \"area\" but also remains a term we have to keep using and hopefully re-inventing to meet contemporary intellectual and political needs.","PeriodicalId":131234,"journal":{"name":"Positions-east Asia Cultures Critique","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Positions-east Asia Cultures Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-2006-029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction to a special issue of "Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique" on the question of "What's Left of Asia?" This essay, co-authored with Yan Hairong, surveys the collected articles within the context of extant work on the meaning and history of the concept of "Asia" within area studies and inter-Asian cultural studies. It also grounds such academic work in the context of past imperial/colonial histories of Asia and within the current globalization of capitalism in the region. "Asia" remains an inherently problematic concept-metaphor for a radically diverse, discontinuous, and conflicted "area" but also remains a term we have to keep using and hopefully re-inventing to meet contemporary intellectual and political needs.
客座编辑介绍:亚洲还剩下什么
《立场:东亚文化批判》关于“亚洲还剩下什么?”问题的特刊导言本文与闫海荣合著,在区域研究和跨亚洲文化研究中“亚洲”概念的意义和历史的现有工作背景下,对所收集的文章进行了调查。它还在亚洲过去的帝国/殖民历史和当前该地区资本主义全球化的背景下建立了这样的学术工作。“亚洲”仍然是一个本质上有问题的概念——一个极端多样化、不连续和冲突的“地区”的隐喻,但也仍然是一个我们必须不断使用并希望重新创造以满足当代智力和政治需求的术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信