Attitudes Towards Potential Harmful Magical Practices in Contemporary Paganism - A Survey

Bethan Juliet Oake
{"title":"Attitudes Towards Potential Harmful Magical Practices in Contemporary Paganism - A Survey","authors":"Bethan Juliet Oake","doi":"10.1558/pome.34988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2016, a group of witches organised a mass online hex against Brock Turner, the “Stanford Rapist,” in disgust toward his crime and unjust punishment. Responses to this event demonstrate the enormous diversity in Pagan’s opinions regarding the use of hexes, curses, or other forms of potentially “harmful” magic. The research outlined in this article consists of a qualitative survey which sought to identify these differences in opinion and the reasoning behind them. Results demonstrated that Pagans’ attitudes towards potentially harmful uses of magic fell into four distinct categories. It appears that fears of misjudgment and discrimination are very present amongst many within the community, which has led to some individuals attempting to conceal any practices that may be deemed harmful, or “evil,” by outsiders. Additionally, some choose to abstain from using harmful magic due to fears of harm returning to them. However, a significant proportion of Pagans today are in fact open to engaging with potentially harmful magical practices, as long as they can in some way be channeled to provide an outcome that can be deemed positive and/or healing.","PeriodicalId":399111,"journal":{"name":"Pomegranate: The International Journal of Pagan Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pomegranate: The International Journal of Pagan Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/pome.34988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2016, a group of witches organised a mass online hex against Brock Turner, the “Stanford Rapist,” in disgust toward his crime and unjust punishment. Responses to this event demonstrate the enormous diversity in Pagan’s opinions regarding the use of hexes, curses, or other forms of potentially “harmful” magic. The research outlined in this article consists of a qualitative survey which sought to identify these differences in opinion and the reasoning behind them. Results demonstrated that Pagans’ attitudes towards potentially harmful uses of magic fell into four distinct categories. It appears that fears of misjudgment and discrimination are very present amongst many within the community, which has led to some individuals attempting to conceal any practices that may be deemed harmful, or “evil,” by outsiders. Additionally, some choose to abstain from using harmful magic due to fears of harm returning to them. However, a significant proportion of Pagans today are in fact open to engaging with potentially harmful magical practices, as long as they can in some way be channeled to provide an outcome that can be deemed positive and/or healing.
当代异教对潜在有害魔法行为的态度——调查
2016年,一群女巫对“斯坦福强奸犯”布洛克·特纳(Brock Turner)的罪行和不公正的惩罚感到厌恶,组织了一场大规模的在线巫术。对这一事件的反应表明了异教对使用六边形、诅咒或其他形式的潜在“有害”魔法的看法的巨大差异。本文概述的研究包括一项定性调查,旨在确定这些意见差异及其背后的原因。结果表明,异教徒对潜在有害的魔法使用的态度分为四个不同的类别。看来,社区内许多人对误判和歧视的恐惧非常普遍,这导致一些人试图隐瞒任何可能被外人视为有害或“邪恶”的做法。此外,有些人选择放弃使用有害的魔法,因为害怕伤害回到他们身上。然而,今天相当大比例的异教徒实际上愿意参与潜在有害的魔法实践,只要他们能以某种方式被引导,提供一个可以被认为是积极的和/或治疗的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信